Argentina, a football powerhouse in South America, is undergoing a political change. The agent of this change is a special figure, he is known as the Trump of Argentina, and his name is Milley. After Milley's election victory, Trump congratulated him and planned a personal visit to Argentina.
Milley's victory in the election is closely related to the situation in Argentina. The ruling party in the past has led to the difficulties of the people in Argentina, with inflation as high as 140% and possibly even more than 200%, and the people are living in hardship and discontent is high. Therefore, the Argentine people urgently need reforms to improve the status quo.
Milley, on the other hand, is an economist who advocates a free economy and gets rid of the intervention of the **, which seems to have won the support of the Argentine people. At the same time, Milley took drastic reform measures to eliminate redundant bureaucracy and reduce any useless bureaucracy.
Milley's aim was to reduce fiscal spending and reduce the size of civil servants, which also seemed to be in line with public opinion, so that Milley could gain more support. In addition, Milley is also open on other issues, such as whether abortion is allowed in some sensitive areas. And how to deal with China, Russia, Brazil and other countries? How to expand more**?
But do the people really approve of Milaydan**? Maybe not necessarily. Milley was a surprise winner, and in any case, the Argentine people just wanted something to change, to abandon the governing philosophy of the ruling party of the past, and to choose a party that would give hope to the people, which is why Milley was elected.
Milley made a lot of promises during the campaign, can he keep it? For example, the elimination of more bureaucracy, this possibility is relatively large, as the ** has the right to do so, as long as Congress can agree, everything else is easy to say.
However, it is unrealistic to draw a clear line with countries such as China, Russia, and Brazil. At the same time, Milley also pointed out in an interview with reporters that it is a businessman's decision to choose which countries to do business with. Since Milley does not interfere in the economy and advocates a free economy, it is unlikely that he will consider completely severing relations with certain countries, but political relations may be reduced to a minimum. This also shows whether the so-called liberal economy promoted by Millet can be adapted to the future development of Argentina. For example, if you don't even want a currency, you can use the dollar completely, and since you use the dollar, that is, there is no need for a useless institution like the central bank. Completely making the Fed Argentina's central bank is a radical reform that the original ruling party would never dare to do.
Since the original ruling party could not do this, the ruling party led by Milley has now begun to vigorously carry out reforms. What the people of Argentina need is change, not a small change but a big change, or even a big change, and only Milley can meet the needs of the Argentine people. Of course, as Milley is so radical, whether it will lead Argentina to glory or go deeper into the abyss, we might as well let time tell.