It's the New Year, it's good to be home! The secretary of the village branch was a classmate of mine, and while I was drinking, he told me something about one of my nephews, and he said that he couldn't make up his mind for a while.
Here's what happened, the village signed a preliminary cooperation agreement with an agricultural company to help the company transfer 1,000 acres of contiguous land to grow Chinese medicinal herbs. After the mobilization, the people in the village basically agreed to transfer the land, but my nephew was unwilling, and he had to cultivate it himself. He also threatened that the land was his own, and that the village had no right to dispose of his land, and that if it was to build roads or schools, he would be willing to take it out for free, but he would not do it if it was transferred out and let others make a fortune.
The meaning of the branch secretary is also very clear, saying that the land is collective, and the village has the right to transfer outward, and if it doesn't work, it will be strong. The implication is that I should persuade, persuade, or warn this nephew to be honest and obedient.
I think that it is good to take out the land from the peasants and carry out circulation in a unified manner. However, it is still necessary to respect the wishes of the peasants and respect the land contract policy, as forced circulation will cause instability in the countryside.
Of course, I agreed to the secretary's request. Standing on a different standpoint, he explained some reasoning to his nephew, saying that his approach did not violate the policy and that he had autonomy. However, from the perspective of the collective economy and the interests of the whole group, he also has the obligation to cooperate. But he wouldn't agree anyway.
Today, I set up a wine bureau and invited them over, hoping that they would each take a step back and exchange the land, that is, the land where his family was located in the center of the preliminary circulation agreement, and exchange it to the edge, so that the land circulation of that company would not be affected, and the two parties would not affect their respective agricultural production and operation in the future.
Whether this approach works or not depends on whether the wine game is smooth or not today. We'll talk about it tomorrow. Supply and marketing cooperatives