The five-guarantee household policy is an important policy implemented by China to ensure the basic life of the elderly in rural areas. However, there are different voices in society about whether the policy should be canceled. Some experts believe that there are some problems with the five-guarantee household system and that it needs to be abolished.
First of all, the uneven distribution of resources under the five-guarantee household system has created an unfair phenomenon. At present, there are a large number of five-guarantee households nationwide, and they receive more preferential treatment than other poor families. This has led to an uneven distribution of resources, making it impossible for some poor families who are not eligible to receive adequate help.
Second, the five-guarantee household system distorts the concept of labor and is not conducive to the development of rural areas. As the five-guarantee households can obtain stable welfare benefits, some elderly people gradually lose the motivation to participate in labor and rely excessively on welfare benefits. This will not only lead to the shortage of labor force in rural areas, but also seriously distort the concept of labor in rural areas and affect the development of rural economy.
In addition, the financial pressure of the five-guarantee household system is huge, and the system is difficult to sustain. The implementation of the five-guarantee household system requires a large amount of financial investment, which has brought huge financial pressure to the local government. With the increasing aging of the population, the increase in the number of five-guarantee households has led to an increasing financial burden. Therefore, some experts believe that the financial pressure of the five-guarantee household system has exceeded the capacity of the first and is difficult to sustain.
To sum up, although the five-guarantee household policy aims to ensure the basic life of the elderly in rural areas, the problems existing in the policy cannot be ignored. To address these issues, steps should be taken to refine the policy. On the one hand, equity in the distribution of resources should be strengthened to ensure that all poor households receive adequate assistance.
On the other hand, the elderly should be encouraged to actively participate in labor, establish a correct concept of labor, and promote the development of the rural economy. At the same time, new social security models should be actively explored to reduce fiscal pressure. Only in this way can we better ensure the basic livelihood of the elderly in rural areas and promote the sustainable development of rural areas.
Readers, do you think the five guarantees should be abolished? See you in the comments section!