I watched the movie "Article 20" today, and this movie is different from "Flying Life 2" and "Hot and Hot" I watched two days ago. In this movie, the feelings during the whole viewing period are: irritability, aggrieved, despair, and calm.
may be in line with the atmosphere of the Spring Festival, a lot of "jokes" have been added to the movie, but I feel that these jokes have discounted the movie. Many scenes of the couple's family life played by Ma Li and Lei Jiayin are long-winded. It may be that I have watched fewer TV series in recent years, and I feel that the husband and wife in the movie have been in the movies for 20 years, and they have long known the roots, how can there be so much necessity for bickering, what can't be said well, and they have to hide it every time.
The three cases involved in it: the bus owner's courageous action, the school students' legitimate defense of bullying and the villagers' resistance because their families were subjected to the village bullies for a long time, which eventually led to a bloody case, the three people all need a fair and just result, and due to legal reasons, this "fairness" cannot be obtained, and the "sense of grievance" of the party in the legitimate defense is full of the whole process. The wife of the villager played by Zhao Liying is a deaf and mute person, after her husband was arrested, she was harassed and threatened by the village bully's family, and the bad guys kidnapped her daughter in order to force her to sign a denial that the village bully bullied her, so as to blackmail her. For the sake of her daughter and her husband not to be wronged, she decided to die, and that sense of despair was really desperate to the bone. 
In addition to these three similar cases, there are many similar cases, which eventually led the male protagonist to decide to hold a hearing, explain the facts of the case at the hearing, and ** whether the villagers are guilty or not. This reminds me of the Kunshan Longge case, when Yu Haimin was convicted of justified defense and acquitted, it was really happy. I went out of my way to check the content of Article 20 of the Criminal Law: Article 20: Where an act taken to stop an unlawful infringement is taken in order to protect the state, the public interest, or the person, property, and other rights of oneself or others from an ongoing unlawful infringement, and causes damage to the unlawful infringer, it is justified defense and does not bear criminal responsibility. Where legitimate defense clearly exceeds the necessary limit and causes major harm, criminal responsibility shall be borne, but punishment shall be commuted or waived. Anyone who takes defensive action against an ongoing crime, homicide, robbery, kidnapping, or other violent crime that seriously endangers personal safety, causing an unlawful offense, is not considered to be in excessive defense and does not bear criminal responsibility. After watching the movie, I took this criminal law to heart, but behind such a law is countless cases and living "aggrieved" and "desperate" individuals, as well as families paid a heavy price in exchange. Believe what the movie says at the end: "The law is to make it more expensive for the bad guys to commit crimes, not to make it more expensive for the good guys to make a move". This movie chose to be released during the Spring Festival, and it is estimated that in order to meet the requirements, a lot of "improvements" have been made, similar to the legitimate defenders of the three cases in the movie, it is estimated that it will not be "aggrieved". Fortunately, the word-of-mouth and box office are good, and both the movie itself and moviegoers have gained great comfort. 
List of high-quality authors