China and India hit each other hard!**Surrender threw out ruthless material, it turned out that India was a ghost, and the Chinese side replied hot!
China-India relations, war is back again!What we want to talk about today is not about cold international politics, but about the smoke-filled Balochistan province of Pakistan!Everyone stared wide-eyed, 70 *** actually raised their hands to surrender, do you think this is a movie?Don't underestimate this group of guys, the leader broke the news that the financier behind it is actually India!
You say, what's going on?China's response must also be profoundDon't think it's a trivial matter, this involves *** we can't take it lightly!
Let's take a look at the details of what happened. It's no joke that Chinese companies have been targeted by a recent series of terrorist attacks in Balochistan. In particular, the leader of the Baloch Liberation Army, as well as the Baloch Nationalist Army, actually surrendered. Is this a good thing?It may be a sign of improved regional security, but don't rejoice too soon, the forces behind it are not so simple.
It is reported that these *** did not operate on their own, and external forces gave them funding and support. Not to mention, the actions of the United States against the Taliban, as well as the listing of the BLA as a terrorist organization, are not they suggesting that the drama of international politics is being staged?
What is even more glaring is that India has been accused of supporting this group. Do you believe it?It is ironic that India is still playing tricks here, especially for Chinese investment and construction in Pakistan. Not to mention, the former BLA leaders have admitted that they have received help from the Indian side. The Pakistani side even said that there was solid evidence, but it was not fabricated out of thin air.
China's spokesman Mao Ning responded with great righteousness and awe, strongly condemning any form of support for terrorism, expressing China's clear and firm position and opposing any country that condones, finances or uses terrorist acts to undermine regional and even international security and stability out of selfish interests. It sounds very tough, this tone is simply saying, if you dare to move, we will dare to fight!
Looking at this drama of international politics, I can't help but sigh, is India too much?In this hard-fought war between China and India, India seems to want to enhance its influence through various means, and this terrorist attack has become a bargaining chip for them. However, this is too unscrupulous, right?Even if it is an international wrestling, it can't play a trick on the issue of terrorism, right?
This incident reminds me of the fact that economic and geopolitical rivalries, whether they involve supporting or condoning terrorism, can bring unpredictable and irreparable risks and losses to regional stability. This is really a double-edged sword, what the hell is India trying to do?
It has to be said that the current international situation is complex and changeable, and India seems to be trying to enhance its influence through various means, but is such behavior really desirable?The incident in Balochistan, Pakistan, tells us that when countries engage in economic competition and geopolitical games, we must be careful of those invisible**.
After all, we don't want to see regional instability and the spread of terrorism. Therefore, it is hoped that while competing for their own interests, countries can look at the problem more rationally and not use terrorism as a bargaining chip in political games. On this issue, we look forward to the joint efforts of the international community to contribute to regional peace and stability.
In short, this international political drama is far from over, and China has shown firmness and decisiveness in the process. I don't know if India wants to do more this this time, after all, it is not a wise move to engage in terrorism. May the international community work together to ensure that this contest takes place under the premise of peace and stability.