Why did the "Squib" appear on the "Trident"?
Blessings and misfortunes lurk, blessings and misfortunes lurk. In recent times, the luck of the "British Empire" has been too bad, first the accident of the Queen Elizabeth, and then the "Trident".
On 20 February, the British submarine "Vanguard" conducted an underwater launch test of the "Trident II" (Trident II) in Florida waters of the United States on 30 January, and the 44-foot (13-meter) and 58-ton (58-ton) missile, unable to activate its main thrust, plunged into the sea not far away, honorably completing its mission.
When he saw the news, he was startled, and then he couldn't help laughing, and a scene couldn't help but appear in his mind.
At the same time, many netizens were also stunned when they saw this scene, scolding: "It's been done for several years, it turned out to be a gadget", "It's really an airdrop, the third brother's unique skill", "Even the nuclear bomb failed to succeed, it's too embarrassing!" Misfortune is not a one-way street, and the fate of Britain is like this. ”
The British originally planned to use the "trident" to show their strength and deter others, but they did not expect to touch a nose of ashes, but instead beat their wishful thinking, and only began to set off chrysanthemum flowers on the fifteenth day of the first lunar month.
Interestingly, the site of the missile's fall was "digital only" from the submarine, and the British Secretary of State Shabs was still on board, perhaps frightened.
Therefore, many netizens began to worry about Xia Bosi, this fortune teller, if there is a real nuclear **, won't it be blown to pieces?
In order to avoid becoming the laughing stock of the world, the British ** concealed this matter, but even though the British side has suppressed this matter for more than 20 days, this matter has finally been reported by major **. The "British Empire" must be embarrassed now, and it can't wait to find a crack in the ground to bury itself, right?
As a "country where the sun does not set", the thickness of the United Kingdom's skin is also "leverage". Allegedly, the British side also began a search into the incident afterwards for fear of technology leaks.
This is too weird, isn't it, it's obviously a failed attempt, how can it be leaked out? Isn't it possible that someone is going to secretly learn the skills of "Squibs"? The behaviour of the United Kingdom is a source of ridicule.
In fact, the British are not worried that their secrets will be known, they are just worried that their father will hold them accountable, how can they say such a shameful thing?
Especially the "Trident", which was known as "invincible in the world" eight years ago, was defeated one day, which is really unbelievable, what is going on?
As we all know, the United Kingdom conducted a similar test in 2016, but the result was a deviation in the missile's flight trajectory, which eventually led to a launch error, the details of which are still under wraps, but most people believe that this launch was not aimed at the west coast of Africa, more than 9,000 kilometers away, but directly "hit" the United States.
But because of the relationship between the British Empire and the American father, this matter was suppressed until several years later, and this matter was not known.
This time the defeat was not announced to the public, and the British military also expressed their opinion, but for the sake of "**", they did not provide further details, only to say that this time the failure was due to an accident in a special test, which led to this accident.
The British Empire, not wanting to reveal its true identity, pretended to be serious and said that the test "once again confirmed Britain's nuclear threat capabilities" and that the Trident was "the most trustworthy system in the world."
If you don't succeed twice in a row, can you be reliable? Even if you want to help your dad advertise, you can't lie!
Regarding this question, some netizens also complained for the UK: Did you just let them go? Wouldn't the United States have to bear the consequences?
You know, this thing is not made in the United Kingdom, it was developed by Lockheed Martin in the United States, and the United States and Britain are armed with "Tridents".
The most important thing is that Britain has paid a lot of money for the tattered "Trident".
Back in the 80s of the last century, when Thatcher was in power, the "North Star" was replaced by the "Trident", and the "Trident" became an important part of the British nuclear armament system.
However, it was easy to modify, and it was much more difficult to modify, so much so that the "Trident" became a nightmare for the British people. How can you say that?
Because Biden will make a decision on whether the United States will develop a new generation of nuclear weapons, and at the same time, the United States' decision will also have a certain impact on the UK's plan to upgrade its "Trident" nuclear deterrent.
Since then, the United States has continued to upgrade the Trident and imposed high charges on the United Kingdom, and the British Parliament was forced to make a resolution to upgrade the "Trident" in 2016, as a result, the business cost more than 30 billion euros.
The British defense secretary at the time, who also defended the huge investment, said that abandoning the "Trident" was "putting the long-term security of our people at risk." He said: "Nuclear ** is an objective thing, it will not die." This is the duty of the ** to ensure that we have the ability to prevent others from harming us. ”
However, critics argue that the UK should spend a lot of money on health care, education and social security. Scottish National Party leader and Scottish First Minister Sturgeon said the Trident missile, which was proposed by the UK ahead of the December 2019 elections, said the Trident missile should be scrapped.
Sturgeon said the billion-dollar Trident investment is an "opportunity loss" that should be used to strengthen traditional defenses to better defend the country; This money can be used to build hospitals, build schools, and improve people's livelihood.
And, what angers Britain the most is that the United States intends to use the money that Britain has invested in upgrading its nuclear arsenal.
In addition, Britain lost its nuclear ** due to the Trident. On 25 February this year, Britain was asked to replace its existing nuclear warheads so that they could be matched with the US "Trident" submarine-launched ballistic missile system.
To put it simply, the "Trident" is a trap for the British, and the United States did not succeed on both missiles, and the money is gone.
At the same time, the first tests of the British "Trident" in four years also showed serious problems, and the British nuclear ** deterrent force may be just a "paper tiger".
In 2016, the satellite finally deviated from orbit during the tripartite secondary test, for which the UK spent huge financial resources and efforts to correct its problems.
And in the ** of 2024, it will end in failure again, and all the attempts of the UK will be useless.
So, why does Britain lose again and again? Brother Li thinks that this should be a hole card left by Mei's father.
Generally speaking, in addition to possessing British missiles, the United States is more about the British political situation and military, and Britain once "withdrew from Europe and entered the United States" and almost became the "England" of the United States.
However, the greedy father is also worried about some accidents, if the United States and Britain really tear their faces, the British "Trident" will become their **, and then the United States will suffer a big loss?
Therefore, Brother Arigo believes that a country like the United States will definitely leave Britain with a back hand that will not allow them to attack him with the "Trident", for example, with GPS for navigation. That's why Britain has repeatedly failed on rockets, but it's a pity that the British are like monkeys, and they are used as guns.
The country does not change, its heart does not change, and its heart will be different. The United States *** is not here to support its allies, they are only there to make money, to gain a foothold in the international community. Just like the experts said, if you are equipped with American-style equipment, it is equivalent to being controlled by the United States, whether it is the use of equipment, or maintenance, upgrades, and upgrades, it must rely on the United States, so that the United States can have greater influence in the world.
But do these ** in the United States really work? Britain is the biggest VIP of the United States, and even they have an accident, not to mention the "Harpoons" of Taiwan and other Americans, what good qualities can they have?