Is there a Civil War going to break out in the United States? What's been happening in the United States lately?
The political situation in the United States has always been turbulent, like the cornerstone of a constitution. Recently, in the midst of the civil war in the United States, the great western power, with its escalating internal conflicts, is reminiscent of the most important thing in the Civil War. Today, however, domestic contradictions have been wrapped up in a more modern way: focus, film, and political struggles are intertwined.
Let's take a look at the recent development of Texas, which is almost a subversion of the Americans in the A24 film "Civil War." Governor Greg Abbott's steadfastness and his advocacy of Operation Lone Star reminds us of the film's powerful rebels. Or is it true that the United States is controlled by a certain "Illuminati" and allows intrigues to spread unscrupulously?
This internal conflict, which has arisen over the tense relationship between immigration and the United States, raises questions about the truth behind it: a country based on the rule of law, whose rift between the rule of law and rights has exposed the scars of the old system.
The power game between Texas and the Union shows the powerlessness of the separation of powers system in the face of a major national crisis. U.S. federalism gives each state a degree of autonomy and military power, but it also creates long-standing inconsistencies in internal policy and impediments to the administration of justice.
Bringing battle tanks to Texas for domestic transportation from the United States.
At this point, Republicans in all 25 states have expressed their approval of Abbott, praised him, and sent their own National Guard to Texas. It makes us feel as if we are looking at an empire that was once glorious but is now torn apart. But history is always so similar. Just as the interests of the Hunan and Huai armies were entangled in the Qing Dynasty, some little-known details may still be seen in the wrestling between the US National Guard and the federal government today.
To see if this history can repeat itself, we can start by looking at the actual strength of the Texas state authorities and their National Guard. The Texas Army and Air Force are said to be the strongest in the United States, and their land, sea and air forces can all rank in the top 10 in the world, which is equivalent to the armed forces of a small country. If they can break away from the Federation and become an independent country, then the power they possess will be terrifying to the surrounding countries.
However, this trick alone is far from it. The federal policy of the United States is centered on the "wanderer Zhongyong", and there are sharp soldiers in it. Texas not only has a large number of military facilities, but also has the 3rd Armored Unit of the Federal Army, and the "First Knights", which is known as one of the strongest steel units. Such an arrangement of troops produced a strange equilibrium, and on the surface it appeared that Texas could stand alone against the center, but in fact they were only on their own turf, under the blade of the enemy, maintaining a strange silence.
From a larger perspective, the military confrontation of the United States is a game of time, society and politics, and it is also a nightmare for politicians seeking re-election and manipulating the public in the political game. Such a scene is just like the absurd scene of "King Xiang got sick and ate Taigong" in "Historical Records: Xiang Yu Benji", which is just a reinterpretation of history.
Zhuge Liang's "Teacher Table" once said: Whoever takes the way of the world, the world takes benevolence and righteousness as the first. And in today's American political arena, politicians who control public opinion and power seem to have forgotten what benevolence and benevolence are.
The internal war stalemate in the United States may have started a year ago, and this began a year ago. The migration crisis has spread across the United States, especially in southern border states like Texas, and has become a major concern. The crisis has led to a renewed talk about the division of power among the states, exacerbated by Governor Greg Abbott's decision, which is a direct provocation to federal authorities.
With the support of the *** force, he signed the law, gave the state law enforcement agencies more powers to arrest and deal with offenders, and erected a fence along the Texas border. The purpose of this is to give state legislation a higher status, not to the application of federal law. When the federal government, and Biden in particular, tried to use the power of the U.S. High Court to push back against state bills through legal interference, there was strong opposition.
Although the U.S. High Court of Justice narrowly approved the Biden administration's request, the state's governor refused to comply with the court's decision, instead continued to strengthen the border wall, and was in an "armed standoff" with the federal-affiliated border patrol force. This not only highlights the shortcomings of the interaction between the power of the United States and the excessive power of the states, but also reflects the deep divisions under the current dualist system.
Therefore, the dispute between the United States and the local government is no longer limited to the conflict over the implementation of the law, but involves the question of the foundation of the country's rule. In the U.S., the 26vs25 states make up the two camps of the U.S., which makes the country look like it's somewhere in between. In such a situation, some politicians have shown a posture of resistance on the surface, but at a deeper level, these so-called confrontations are just a form of political performance.
A closer look at the contradictions between Texas and the Union is like the Cold War era of "Cold War", both countries are betting on a zero-sum game in order to gain more support in the chaos of the first year, and they are happy to profit from it.
Therefore, although the current situation is tense, the probability of a real war is very low, and the social structure of the United States dooms this war to be unjustified, and there is also an incomprehensible emotional estrangement. The struggle between Texas and the United States was more of a raucous drama than a battle in the true sense of the word.
In the end, will the war be like the film "Civil War", which will stage a drama with a national theme? Or is it just a taunting show of dancing for the sake of the campaign? The answer to this question has probably been known to everyone for a long time, just waiting to be revealed. Where the future of the United States is headed is also the focus of the world's attention.