Holding high the banner of localization, we cannot become the next Japan
Text: Jumping conversation skills.
In the current context of our constant stifling by American technological restrictions, the slogan of localization is getting louder and louder. Of course, localization is not just a slogan, and in the field of chips, many of us have started to localize instead. And domestic manufacturers can adapt to the needs of the situation and prefer domestic chips as much as possible.
Clearly, the ban has accelerated our process of localizing substitution.
At this time, one of the experts said: that is, we cannot become a second Japan under the substitution of localization.
In fact, the development history of various Japanese companies, such as Toshiba and Sony, makes us feel that they have experienced a peak in the past, but after so many years, many Japanese giants have begun to show the decline of Toshiba's exclusion in the past, which makes many people feel embarrassed. At this time, many people say that this is a gradual weakening of competitive power. However, this statement is too superficial, and the reason why Japanese companies have come to this point is the failure of industrial chain competition.
Look at companies like Toshiba and Sony, aren't their main business chains all starting to go downhill? As soon as they start to go downhill, the whole industry chain will start to go downhill as well. To take the simplest example, Japan's automotive industry is currently at a slight disadvantage in the era of global electrification. If this trend cannot be reversed, Japan's engine, battery and other leading manufacturers will be in trouble.
In this"Localization"The reason why we are afraid to become a second Japan is because our localization is not just for the domestic market. To compete in any field, there are three basic points: being able to manufacture, being able to sell, and being able to enter the ** chain.
What do you think the United States is afraid of? Are they really afraid that we make the most advanced chips? To be honest, of these three key points, it is easiest to make your own chips. Because it actually depends on technology, on funding, as long as you have enough funds, financial resources and energy to develop chips, there can be domestic alternatives. The current situation is the best illustration of this. But what about sales? What about contacting more ** chains?
I had to pour a basin of cold water, although the meal had to be eaten one bite at a time, and the road had to be walked step by step, and what we can't do now doesn't mean we won't be able to do it in the future. However, at present, we are indeed in these three key points, only step by step forward, if we can't sell it in the follow-up, and we can't penetrate the internal ** chain, in fact, just what is built, it is too superficial to talk about localization.
We can't sell to more places, which means that our production strength is not competitive enough. Think about it, why are foreign companies still trying to seize the Chinese market when our domestic chips can already be replaced, just because they are unwilling to give up? Not so, but because they see hope and they have enough confidence in their products. Our domestic market can really tie with them, let alone foreign markets?
As for the in-depth study of the inner workings of the ** chain, this point is very simple, that is, the influence of national brands on the market. For example, when it comes to artificial intelligence chips, people think of Nvidia. When it comes to mobile phone processors, the first thing that comes to mind is Qualcomm Snapdragon (at present, Kirin is still a way out), and our national technology companies rarely have such influence. The above are the three key points, but if there is a lack of advancement, then our localization is really just localization - just to serve the domestic market.
That's why they're restricting us, because they're afraid that in the future, we'll kick them out at the bottom of the chain. Therefore, experts say that we must not become a second Japan, and this is also a question worth considering. There is still a long way to go regarding the future of nationalization. What are your thoughts on this? Feel free to leave a message, like and share!