Follow me and I will share some interesting stories and experiences on a regular basis to exchange educational experiences together.
Recently, a paragraph about Mercedes-Benz car plugging has caused great controversy and questions on the Internet. At that time, after seeing this **, everyone generally believed that it was a Mercedes-Benz man who plugged and smashed the old man's car, expressed indignation at his behavior, and demanded that he be severely punished. Subsequently, the Xuwen County Public Security Bureau issued a notice that the owner of the Mercedes-Benz Wang, who was administratively detained for ten days and fined 500 yuan, seemed to be over.
Surprisingly, however, as things have unfolded, the direction of the wind has shifted. With the complete **, the truth of the matter does not seem to be what it was originally assumed. From the complete **, we can clearly see that the Mercedes Benz is not plugged, on the contrary, the white car is suspected of being plugged. A panoramic view** shows two parallel lanes ahead, alternating traffic. It can be seen from the ** that the Mercedes-Benz and the Tank 300 were driving side by side at that time, and Ms. Xu's car happened to be behind the Tank 300. According to the content, the Mercedes Benz stopped and gave way to the tank 300 car. According to the rules of the road, it should be the turn of the Mercedes Benz next, and then Ms. Xu's vehicle. However, when the Tank 300 passed, Ms. Xu's car drove into the side-by-side position of the Mercedes, causing the Mercedes' radar alarm to start sounding. From this point of view, the white vehicle is suspected of jamming. Subsequently, the Mercedes man had an argument with the person in the white car, and it can be seen from the conversation in the car that everyone dissuaded Wang from getting out of the car, but he became angry and ignored it, and finally a series of events we saw happened. After completing ***, 6 questions from netizens were triggered, hoping to be answered.
1. Is Chery's loss assessment of 5,200 yuan reasonable?
Some netizens questioned the loss assessment fee of 5,200 yuan, and said that they felt that the loss assessment fee was too high, and the loss of a few hundred yuan should not cause such a big controversy. In addition, some netizens questioned whether Chery Automobile's maintenance costs were reasonable.
2. What kind of punishment will Grandma Xu receive if she is overcrowded on the road?
Netizens raised questions about Grandma Xu's overcrowding on the road, and wanted to know the results of the relevant departments' handling of the matter. The netizen also pointed out that there were six people in the car, including the male driver, the daughter of the photo, the grandmother, the old man and two children. If the number of people in the car does exceed the allowable limit, then the relevant authorities should be able to deal with the matter, and Ms. Xu is also obliged to give an explanation.
3. Is it illegal to delete and splic**?
Netizens questioned whether there was editing, deletion, and splicing. If it is uploaded to the network after editing and splicing, which triggers the impact of **, then this behavior may be illegal, and in serious cases, it may be punished by law.
4. **The owner of the Mercedes-Benz claimed to have been hit, does this involve illegality?
According to the entire paragraph of **'s observations, the Mercedes Benz man did claim to have been hit by Ms. Xu's car, but Ms. Xu did not admit it. Therefore, this issue also needs to be investigated by the relevant departments and a reasonable judgment based on the facts.
5. Does the Chery car be jammed and does it violate traffic rules?
In **, there is no official report on whether Chery cars really have plugged behavior, or whether Mercedes-Benz cars are plugged or Chery cars are plugged. Therefore, we are not in a position to comment and discuss this point, and we need to wait for the official notification before we can analyze and judge.
6. Expectations for the innocence of Hebei people
Some netizens hope to return the innocence of Hebei people, and pointed out that it was not Grandma Xu, who was in her 70s, who was driving, but a male driver. The authenticity of this matter needs to be further investigated and verified. If there was indeed a male driver driving instead of Grandma Xu, why did Ms. Xu insist that the driver at the time of the incident was Grandma Xu, who was in her 70s? In order to clarify the facts, Ms. Xu can provide the dashcam on her car** to restore the truth of the whole incident.
Ms. Xu responded to the reversal of ** and said that she did not add a plug, and the real plugged was a Mercedes-Benz. She also believes that neither smashing cars nor verbally abusing them is ethical and legal. In response to her questioning, Ms. Xu called for her dashcam to be made public to restore the truth of the incident. In this way, the truth of the matter can be revealed.
To sum up, through the complete **of**, the truth of the matter has been reversed, and it has aroused questions from the public and netizens. Netizens have raised questions about the cost of damage assessment, vehicle overcrowding, **editing, vehicle collisions, and congestion behavior. Ms. Xu responded to the reversal of the situation and expressed her willingness to disclose the dash cam** to restore the truth of the matter. At present, whether the truth can be clarified, we still need to continue to wait for the investigation and announcement of the relevant departments.
Your attention is my motivation, and your support is the direction we are heading. Follow me and you can see my latest articles, hear my unique insights and in-depth analysis on various topics, and let's explore the ocean of knowledge together!