Recently, the CBA league issued a new rule that stipulates that only the coach of the winning side can give a post-match sideline interview, while the coach of the losing side is not allowed to take any ** questions. This regulation has aroused dissatisfaction and questions from many fans and **, believing that this is disrespectful and discriminatory against the losing side, as well as unfair and opaque to the event.
In my opinion, this regulation is very absurd and unreasonable, it not only violates the principles of sportsmanship and fair competition, but also damages the image and reputation of the CBA league, and deprives fans and ** of the right to know the truth of the event. I will elaborate my views from the following aspects.
First of all, this provision is disrespectful and discriminatory against the losing side. In sports, winning and losing are common, and there is no permanent winner or permanent loser. Losing does not mean losing dignity and value, but you should learn from your failures, reflect on your shortcomings, and strive to improve your level and strive for a better performance next time. And winning does not mean that you can be proud and complacent, but you should remain humble and low-key, respect the efforts of your opponents, thank them for their challenges, continue to maintain good form, and meet stronger opponents. This is the embodiment of sportsmanship and the charm of sports events.
However, this rule completely ignores this point, treating the losing side as a sinner, the winning side as a saint, the post-match interview as a reward and punishment, and the tournament as a life-and-death contest. This approach not only hurts the feelings of the losing side, but also affects the mentality of the winning side, and destroys the atmosphere of the game, making the game lose the basis of fairness and respect, and turning it into a game of winning and losing.
Secondly, this provision is unfair and opaque to the event. In sports competitions, post-match interviews are an important way of information transmission and communication, which can allow fans and players to understand the process and results of the game, listen to the views and feelings of coaches and players, analyze the highlights and problems of the game, evaluate the level and quality of the game, and the trend and prospects of the game. The post-match interview is a supplement and improvement to the event, as well as a kind of supervision and evaluation of the event.
However, this regulation deprives this right by allowing only the coach of the winning side to be interviewed, and not allowing the coach of the losing side to make any statements, which leads to incomplete and unbalanced information about the event, as well as unfair and unobjective evaluation of the event. This practice not only deprives fans and leaders of the channel to understand the event, but also deprives the event of the opportunity to be tested, but also makes the event lose the motivation to improve quality, and becomes an opaque and unfair competition.
Finally, this provision is a disservice to the image and reputation of the CBA league. The CBA League is the highest level of men's basketball league in China, which carries the development and progress of Chinese basketball, and also represents the level and status of Chinese basketball. The CBA league should be aimed at improving the level of basketball, promoting the basketball career, popularizing basketball culture, and serving basketball enthusiasts, and should be based on the principles of openness, fairness, justice, and credibility, and should be based on the concept of innovation, enterprising, excellence, and inclusiveness, and should be based on the quality, level, influence, and reputation of the event.
However, this regulation deviates from these goals, it sacrifices the credibility of the event with its own selfishness, it damages the quality of the event with wishful thinking, it lowers the level of the event with its willfulness, and it makes mistakes again and again, affecting the reputation of the event. This approach not only makes the CBA league lose the support and trust of fans and **, but also makes the CBA league lose the advantage of competition and development, and makes the CBA league lose the spirit of basketball and sportsmanship, and becomes a self-closed and self-destructive gamble.
To sum up, I believe that this provision is very wrong and harmful, and it should be canceled and amended immediately to avoid greater losses and consequences. I hope that the CBA League can recognize its mistakes, get back on the right track, respect and protect the rights of the losing side, open and transparent information about the event, improve and improve the quality of the event, restore and enhance the reputation of the event, contribute to the development and progress of Chinese basketball, add luster to the level and status of Chinese basketball, and bring happiness and satisfaction to Chinese basketball lovers and supporters. This is what the CBA league should do, and this is what the CBA league can do.
CBA's new rules: Only the winning coach is allowed to give a post-game courtside interview.