RecentlyUnited States**The "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024" signed by Biden has attracted widespread attention and discussion. Under the provisions of the bill, as of October 2027, the U.S. Department of Defense is prohibited from ...CATLBYDand 4 other Chinese companiesBattery。This move has been interpreted as a US crackdown on Chinese companies, especially for themTeslaThe impact is more direct. However, whether such restrictions will be able to achieve the goals expected by the United States, and for the:China and the United StatesThe impact of the two countries remains the focus of heated discussions. Before analysing this issue, it is necessary to understand the background.
United States**Biden sparked an uproar over the Fiscal Year 2024 National Defense Authorization Act, which states that the U.S. Department of Defense will be banned from October 2027 as of October 2027CATLBYDand 4 other Chinese companiesBattery, the spearhead is pointed at directlyTesla。This restriction is:United States**A new crackdown on Chinese companies aims to restrict Chinese companies from operating inBatteryPosition in the chain.
However, it is questionable whether this move by the United States will be able to achieve the desired goals. First of all, Chinese companies are restrictedBatteryFor theTeslaand other U.S. companies will bring some trouble. TeslaCurrently partialBatteryof** fromBYD, and Ford usedCATLtechnology of productionElectric vehicles。This move could lead to U.S. businesses inElectric vehiclesThe field is facing the problem of the best shortage, which puts it at a disadvantage in the market competition.
However, such restrictions in the United States are not without loopholes. Although the Ministry of Defense has banned procurement from Chinese companiesBattery, but does not impose restrictions on commercial purchases by U.S. businesses. Therefore, U.S. companies can still continue to buy from Chinese companiesBattery。And, despite being in the top 10 in the world nowBatteryThree of the companies are Chinese companies, but the United StatesCarsThere are still many international brands in the market that choose ChinaBatteryFor example, eight of the ten most popular car companies in Thailand are Chinese car companies, among themBYDRanked first. Therefore,United States**Unilateral suppression of ChinaBatteryIt remains to be seen and assessed whether the industry can truly prevent the rise of Chinese companies in the global market.
United States**Restrictions on Chinese companies don't start recently. Back last year, the US Treasury Department was on ChinaBatterySanctions were imposed, it was stipulated that each vehicle was installedMade in ChinaBatteryVehicles with spare parts will lose their eligibility for the $7,500 subsidy. This measure is aimed at restricting the use of Chinese companies in theBatteryThe development of the industry has weakened its position in the global ** chain. In addition,United States**It has also been launched for ChinaCarsBatteryby excluding Chinese companies from restricting their presence in theBatteryParticipation in the chain.
However, the U.S. restrictions on Chinese companies have not had the desired effect. First of all, this practice of the United States may raise the United StatesElectric vehiclesThe ** makes consumers prohibitive. Moreover, Chinese companies are inElectric vehiclesThe achievements in the field do not come out of nowhere, but are achieved through continuous innovation and hard work. Even ifUnited States**Trying to do so by restricting Chinese companies inBattery** Participation in the chain to hinder its development, and other companies in the international market will also take the initiative to provide support and cooperation opportunities for Chinese enterprises. According to reports, some places in the United States have even involved Chinese participationBatteryThe project provides support in the hope of attracting foreign investment and providing employment opportunities for the country's people.
Therefore,United States**Restrictive measures on Chinese companies could backfire, leading to U.S. restrictionsCarsThe industry has been adversely affected and at the same time exacerbatedChina and the United Statescompetition and tension between them. The U.S. should face up to the presence of Chinese companiesBatterystrong strength in the industry, and explore ways to cooperate with Chinese enterprises to jointly promoteElectric vehiclesThe development of the industry to achieve a win-win situation.
China and the United StatesCompetition and friction are inevitable, but the two sides should resolve their differences through cooperation and dialogue, rather than achieving their own interests through restrictions and suppression. China and the United StatesThe two countries have extensive cooperation and convergence of interests in many fields, and they should strengthen cooperation on the basis of the principle of mutual benefit and win-win results to promote the stable development of bilateral relations.
In the current globalEconomyAgainst the backdrop of increasing competitionChina and the United StatesThe two countries are the two largest in the worldEconomyWe should strengthen cooperation and jointly address challenges and difficulties. China and the United StatesThe two sides should strengthen scientific and technological innovation and industrial cooperation to form a joint force and jointly promote the optimization and upgrading of the global industrial pattern.
In short, the U.S. has a relationship with Chinese companiesBatteryIndustry restrictions may have an impact, but they don't really stop Chinese companies from growing. On the contrary, such an approach could backfire and leave the United States in its own handsElectric vehiclesThe industry is facing difficulties. China and the United StatesThe two countries should resolve their differences through cooperation and dialogue and work togetherElectric vehiclesThe development of the industry to achieve a win-win situation. Only mutual respect and equal treatment can achieve common prosperity and development.