Fireworks, is a festive symbol, but can also bring harm and danger when used carelessly or mismanaged. This article will tell about a 10-year-old boy who accidentally threw itFireworksThe tragedy that resulted in burns in young children, and the controversy over compensation that arose after the incident. ParentalEducationResponsibility, Code of Conduct for Minors,Social** reflections are all worth pondering about this incident.
In Weifang City, Shandong Province, a 10-year-old boy willFireworksAccidentally thrown into the neck of a young child, causing the latter** to suffer. However, the other parent refused to bear the liability for compensation on the grounds that the child did not mean it. As soon as this incident was sparked, it immediately aroused anger and discussion among netizens.
According to the parents of the injured, the child was not familiar with the 10-year-old boy and had not had a holiday before. When a 10-year-old boy twice willFireworksWhen thrown at the child, the latter is afraid to dodge, which eventually leadsFireworksOccurrence of burn incidents. The parents of both sides had a disagreement on the issue of compensation, and the parents of the other party rejected the claim for compensation on the grounds that the Chinese New Year was busy.
Expanding: After this incident, many netizens left messages to express their dissatisfaction and anger with each other's parents. They argue that regardless of the intent, the harm has already been done and responsibility should be clear. And some netizens pointed out that whether the child is aware of the danger or premeditated is not a reason for compensation, and compensation should be the most basic morality. This has also sparked a discussion about parental and guardianship responsibilities.
After the incident, there was an uproar. Some netizens accused the parents of the 10-year-old boy that they should be responsible for their children's behavior, believing that it was immoral to evade liability. It was also argued that violations should be treated with due diligence, regardless of ageLawssanctions, parents should bearEducationLiability for incompetence.
Expanding: The fermentation of ** has made this injury incident more and more interesting. Netizens have launched a wide range of activities on the issue of juvenile delinquency. Some advocate sending the perpetrators to juvenile detention centersEducation, thinks the parentEducationResponsibility should not be overlooked, and violations committed by children should not be left unchecked. This incident also causedSocialRightHomeschoolingand a deep reflection on guardianship responsibilities.
There has been controversy over the issue of compensation between the parents of the burned child and the parents of the 10-year-old boy in the case of injuries. There are differences between the two parties on the liability and the amount of compensation, which has aroused widespread heated discussions.
The parents of the injured child believe that the parents of the 10-year-old boy who caused the accident should be held responsible for the child's behavior and bear the corresponding liability for compensation. However, the mother of the 10-year-old boy refused the claim for compensation on the grounds that the child did not mean to, resulting in an agreement between the two parties.
Expansion: Liability is the focus of controversy in this injury incident. Some netizens believe that whether the child did it intentionally or not, the injury has been caused, and the responsibility for compensation cannot be shirked. In ethics andLawsAt the same time, parents should be responsible for their children's behavior. And the other parent's refusal to compensate on the grounds of "not intentional" triggeredSocial** Widespread condemnation.
In addition to the issue of liability, the amount of compensation has also become the focus of controversy. For parents of injured children, the amount of compensation is not the most important thingCriticalIt is the parents of the other party who should take their due responsibility. The parents of the 10-year-old boy tried to evade liabilitySocialcaused quite a bit of controversy.
Expansion: A dispute over the amount of compensation has also arisenSocialRightLawsprescribed concerns. Some argue that the amount of compensation should be reasonable and equitable and should not be mitigated because of the young age of the perpetrator. At the same time, everyone is also thinking about how to fundamentally solve similar incidents and strengthen the safety awareness and norms of minorsEducationto avoid the recurrence of such injuries.
From hereFireworksWounded incidents, triggeredSocialAttention and discussion from all walks of life. On the issue of compensation, I believe that regardless of whether the child was intentional or premeditated, the injury has already been caused and the liability for compensation should be clear. Parents as the firstGuardians, should be responsible for the child's behavior and supervisionEducationLiability, which should not be evaded on various grounds. At the same time,SocialMinors should be strengthenedLawsAwareness and safetyEducationto avoid the recurrence of similar incidents. It also requires more people to work together to build a safer and more harmonious placeSocialEnvironment.