In the present dayChina and the United StatesTechnologyIn the context of the war,ChipsThe industry is competing for the commanding heights, and as the world's leading oneChipsManufacturing companies, TSMC is even more concerned. China and the United StatesThe two countries have been competing fiercely for TSMC for a long time, and the various operations and results reflect the strategies and dilemmas of both sides in this battle. This article will**China and the United StatesThe process and results of the competition for TSMC analyze the winners and losers of this technology war from different angles.
China and the United StatesThe competition for TSMC can be said to be a severe wrestling, and on the mainland side, the importance of TSMC can be described as cautious. Looking at the strategy adopted by the mainland for TSMC, it has always been based on healthy competition as the main means. Previously, it was assertedMartial artsTaiwan, but this approach is obviously not the best policy for Chinese mainland. In this context, capital acquisition has become the primary strategy for the mainland to compete for TSMC. Zhao WeiguoInChipsThe practice of capital investment in the field is quite representative, and he tries to expand through capital operationChipsmanufacturing industry scale, committed to building a hugeChipsImperial. However, the reality tells us that the goal of acquiring core technology cannot be achieved by relying solely on capital acquisitions. Chinese officials are on the sidelines in this scramble as they thinkTaiwanEnterprises belong to China and do not need to intervene too much. Against this backdrop, China suffered a setback in its attempt to acquire TSMC and failed to achieve the goals set at the beginning.
China's strategy is actually revealing an important fact: while capital acquisitions can be scaled up quickly, if you want to master the core technology, you need to do solid self-development.
Expansion: Capital acquisition can quickly achieve industrial expansion to a certain extent, but it is not a silver bullet in the pursuit of core technology. China's cautious attitude and sense of healthy competition in the process of competing for TSMC highlight the strategic thinking of a mature power. This insistence actually implies the rightTechnologyRespect for R&D and deep thinking about the sustainable development of the future. Acquire core technologies through independent research and development, and become ChinaTechnologyThe fundamental path of industrial upgrading.
The U.S. strategy in the fight for TSMC presents a different side, with its high subsidy policy and coercion and inducement very deceptive. The maneuver that the United States has always adopted is also quite hegemonic. AgainstTaiwanThe United States has seized on the region's sensitive sentiments toward the mainland. From the perspective of the United States, the most important concern for enterprises is security and development, while the United States deliberately exaggeratesTaiwan, trying to make TSMC fearful, and then drag it into the arms of the United States. Biden is even more to attract TSMC and promises to give development subsidies, but this is not the case. U.S. law requires access to trade secrets, which is undoubtedly a sinister choice for a company like TSMC with key confidential technology. The bigger threat is that the change of office may bring about policy changes, and once the subsidy is canceled, TSMC's situation will be more difficult. In addition, with the continuous increase in investment, TSMC's profits in the United States are not ideal, coupled with the pressure of local ** demanding profits, TSMC is in a predicament. In the end, Liu Deyin resigned, and TSMC could not develop as desiredChina and the United StatesThe battle for the rush ended in defeat.
Expansion: In the process of competing for TSMC, the United States took advantage ofTaiwanThe political sensitivities of the region and the pursuit of safe development by enterprises have created an elaborate trap for TSMC. United States**'s deception and capriciousness put TSMC at the mercy of a passive situation. The weakness of the business is eventually exploited, and what started as an opportunity becomes a heavy burden. This story also reminds us that in international competition, false ** and political risks may lead to heavy costs for enterprises, and independent research and development is still the key path to achieve long-term development.
China and the United StatesDifferent strategies were adopted in the fight for TSMC, but in the end they all showed a losing ending. Capital acquisition or high subsidies are of course a temporary measure, but for the mastery of the core technology of enterprises, independent research and development is still the only way out. And this rush to buy is also pointed out for usTechnologyThe law of industrial competition emphasizes the importance of independent innovation and core technology. Hopefully, ChineseChipsThe industry can get rid of the interference of the external environment as soon as possible and truly move towards the road of independence and sustainable development.