The strength of the US ballistic missile defense system and the power of China's Dongfeng-41 intercontinental missile have launched a technical and strategic contest, and the wrestling between the two sides in the nuclear field has aroused worldwide attention. As a pioneer in the field of anti-missile technology, the United States' missile defense system was once regarded as a sharp weapon to change the balance of nuclear powers, but in the face of the simultaneous launch of China's 24 Dongfeng-41s, whether it can successfully intercept them has become the focus of attention.
Although the US missile defense system is at the first-line level in the world, it will not be easy to deal with such a formidable opponent as China's Dongfeng-41. Between nuclear attack and defense, the game of contradictions and shields has always been in full swing. The US anti-missile system has made some progress in mid-course interception technology, but it still faces enormous challenges. Technological superiority does not mean that an adversary's nuclear strike can be completely prevented, especially when it comes to intercontinental missiles, which are extra-atmospheric means of strike.
China's strategic counterattack has also shown its flexible side. In addition to land-based nuclear forces, China also has the capability of nuclear counterattack at sea, and through submarine-launched intercontinental missiles carried by strategic nuclear submarines, it can achieve a secondary nuclear counterattack against the United States. This strategic layout makes it difficult for the United States to predict the whereabouts of China's nuclear missiles, increasing the uncertainty of a nuclear conflict.
At the technical level, the advent of hypersonic ** also poses challenges to traditional missile defense systems. China's leading position in the hypersonic field means that the development of US anti-missile technology may be affected, adding new variables to the future security landscape. At a time when the global situation is turbulent, the potential possibility of nuclear conflict cannot be ignored, and the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict is a warning to the world.
If we want to avoid the destruction of our country by nuclear weapons, we can only promote world peace, give up the containment and suppression of China and Russia and other countries, and abandon the thinking of a new Cold War between the East and the West. International security and stability can be truly achieved only through cooperation, not confrontation. The United States needs to assess the situation and fundamentally improve its own security situation, instead of relying on a single missile defense system.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area below.