Your attention is my motivation, and your support is the direction we are heading. Follow me and you can see my latest articles. Appreciate the changes in the international situation.
The Houthis have shown stubborn resistance in Yemen's confrontation with US and British forces. Despite eight rounds of airstrikes, the Houthis have remained steadfast in their blockade operations and have used anti-ship ballistic missiles directly against the US fleet. According to Houthi spokesman Yahya Sareala, they successfully carried out missile strikes on two American merchant ships in the waters of the Gulf of Aden and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, as well as clashed with a number of American escort destroyers. The Houthis have been targeted by the Houthis, who believe they are carrying military supplies linked to the United States and Israel. Although the battle lasted only two hours, the Houthis claimed victory. They claimed to have fired ** anti-ship ballistic missiles from land against sea targets during the day, one of which successfully hit a US ** ship and forced the other two merchant ships to turn around and evacuate. However, the US side denied this, saying that there were no reports of damage to the ship or personnel.
The Houthis' bravery was astounding, given that they were facing one of the most powerful naval forces in the world. Although the Houthis do not possess modern military equipment, they have resisted strong pressure from the United States and Britain with their tenacious will and unafraid of sacrifice. The Houthis' anti-ship ballistic missiles have become a powerful force against the US military, although the performance and combat effectiveness of these missiles are relatively low. In this confrontation, the Houthis have demonstrated their will and ability to fight, defying the threat of a strong enemy and firmly defending what they believe is a just cause.
The anti-ship ballistic missile used by the Houthis is the Iranian-made Persian Gulf-2 missile. Although the missile has some penetration capability and a range of about 300 kilometers, it is slow and vulnerable to interception. According to US military reports, the Houthis fired three missiles at the US-flagged container ship, one of which failed and fell into the sea, and the other two were intercepted and shot down by US missile destroyers. This shows that the Houthi missiles have certain limitations in terms of accuracy and destructive power. In the face of powerful US warships, it is difficult for a small number of missiles to pose a substantial threat to them. In order to effectively strike US warships, the Houthis need to have an efficient command system and coordinate multiple simultaneous launches to achieve the effect of saturation attacks.
Although the "Persian Gulf"-2 missile used by the Houthis has a certain range, its penetration performance and combat effectiveness are obviously insufficient compared with modern missiles. This makes it difficult for Houthi missiles to pose a substantial threat to the U.S. military's maritime power. Advances in missile interception technology have allowed modern naval warships to shoot down incoming missiles with relative ease, protecting themselves and those on board. While Houthi missiles are effective against small ships or merchant ships, they are powerless against a formidable adversary like the U.S. military.
However, the limitations of missiles do not mean that the Houthis do not have other effective means of strike. They need to create a powerful command system capable of coordinating the simultaneous launch of various **. Only by a large number of attacks and sound tactics can a substantial threat be posed to the enemy fleet. In addition, efforts are needed to improve the performance and combat effectiveness of missiles in order to better defend themselves against counterattacks from the US military in future battles.
The Houthi actions in the Red Sea region have sparked different perspectives and discussions. According to the positive side, the Houthis have the authority to restrict the passage of ships associated with Israel in the Red Sea and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, and to guarantee the safe passage of legitimate ships. The opposing side argues that, according to the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, all merchant ships should enjoy complete freedom of navigation on the high seas, and no country should exercise jurisdiction over the high seas or restrict the passage of merchant ships. The contradiction between these two views has led to a disagreement over support for the Houthi operation.
Individual views on this issue will vary depending on their values, political positions, and level of understanding of regional conflicts. From the perspective of maintaining security and stability in the Red Sea region, the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea should be respected and the right of freedom of navigation for all merchant ships on the high seas should be ensured. At the same time, military activities related to Israel and the United States require transparency and compliance with international law. Resolving regional conflicts through peaceful diplomacy is the key to maintaining regional and world peace.
Follow me to get the latest and hottest information, so that you can keep up with the pace of the times and understand the latest trends! Every bit of yours, I will remember in my heart; I appreciate your words and deeds.