Entrepreneurs who control enterprises can be turned into family industries, joint-stock industries, and of course, public ownership industries. No matter what, the best entrepreneurs will always appear, why is this happening?
* Entrepreneurs in the family business will work hard to produce and occupy the market with their products. They believe that the company they lead can continue to forge ahead, can be closely aligned with the market, can meet market demand, and can continue to renew. However, such a family business itself is controlled by the best entrepreneurs, which may generate huge profits or cause huge waste. When there is a human crisis, it is possible to bring the enterprise to the brink of collapse. Of course, the best family entrepreneurs will work hard to train the best people, let them study abroad, learn advanced foreign management experience, obtain a certain recognition, and even directly introduce the Western management model, but will not adopt the shareholding system. In the final analysis, the family business is family, not multi-capital. When an entrepreneur appears in a family business, he will definitely make his own decisions, but he will not make his own decisions blindly, and will make certain judgments after examining the market. However, many family entrepreneurs have the best tendency, can't listen to other people's opinions, just self-respecting, even if they have been in business for a hundred years, they may not be able to grow into a giant enterprise, and it is easy to be complacent and stagnant.
Joint-stock enterprises are more open and survive longer. After the capital enters, although it is short-sighted, the ultimate goal is to make a profit, but capital will restrict the emergence of ** entrepreneurs, of course, it is impossible to completely restrict. Some entrepreneurs who make air conditioners have to make mobile phones, and after making a few mobile phones, the sales are not good, and they finally give up. Later, this entrepreneur pulled up several big capitals to make new energy vehicles together, and did it for a year or two, but the funds could not be consumed, so he had to give up. The waste caused during this period can only be borne by the multiple capital of the investment enterprise, and she will not bear a single dollar herself. In this way, joint-stock enterprises have the attribute of exploration, and it seems that they will do whatever they make money, but it is easy to be blind and easy to lose money, but it will not lose the money of entrepreneurs. When the entrepreneur of the first class has a huge loss due to a decision-making error, the capital will replace him and let other entrepreneurs do it. When many entrepreneurs cannot change the loss-making state, the enterprise will go bankrupt, and the capital will withdraw in time and switch to other enterprises. Even if there are multiple kinds of capital control within the joint-stock system, it cannot change the decision of the ** entrepreneur, because his decision is for capital expansion and appreciation, of course, it will not be opposed, but it is not always profitable, and it is likely to lose money. Where there is exploration, there is failure, and capital is ready.
Within the public enterprises, the entrepreneurs themselves have supreme power, can call the wind and rain, and can make major decisions. But no one seems to have considered the status of the human resources of the entrepreneurs themselves. I just know that entrepreneurs have a lot of power and can lead enterprises to the market and open up territories, but they do not consider what position the entrepreneurs' human resources occupy in the enterprise. Public-owned enterprises should not only be explained from the public property rights of physical capital, but should also see the characteristics of the human resources of entrepreneurs, their talents and spirit, and the right to control and share profits of enterprises. Entrepreneurs in the public sector will have a lot of decision-making power, and even like an out-and-out **. They will communicate with **, and they will get a very generous salary every year, with corporate dividends, they can not be enterprising, and they can be pioneering and innovative. However, under the rule of the first state, many public-owned enterprises often lose money, and most of the loopholes for losses cannot be plugged. Because under the ** of entrepreneurs, many links are not open and transparent, and even if there is a behavior that harms the public and private interests, it will not be discovered. Without strict supervision and audit, and without too much evaluation, of course, there will be the best entrepreneurs.
* The entrepreneurs themselves are not alone, many businesses have appeared, but people are used to it. Because entrepreneurs are responsible for their own profits and losses, and they are responsible for the decisions they make. However, not only is the market changing rapidly and difficult to measure, but entrepreneurship is also rapidly changing and difficult to measure. Entrepreneurship is a very subjective spirit that is difficult to measure and observe, but entrepreneurs must make judgmental decisions that are tested by the market to be effective. Being able to adapt to the market and generate huge profits is considered a good decision; If you can't adapt to the market and incur huge losses, it's a bad decision. Entrepreneurs control the enterprise and decide the allocation of resources within the enterprise, and it is easy to make their own decisions. Not listening to other people's opinions and making your own decisions can certainly highlight the importance of power, but when problems arise, we should not pass the buck to each other, nor should we emphasize the objective environment, and we should bear our own losses. Here, corporate control can be understood as the right of opportunity to bid on "entrepreneurship and talent" in the market. It is in this sense that corporate control constitutes an incentive for entrepreneurs.
It seems that the entrepreneur can have complete control over the enterprise, but there are capital restrictions and cannot mess around. Whether it is a family business or a joint-stock enterprise, no entrepreneur wants to make the enterprise bankrupt, and they all want to lead the enterprise to make money and occupy an important position in the market. However, business management is a science, not something that one person can take for granted. Even some experienced entrepreneurs who manage a business often have problems, and it is not all smooth sailing. When the enterprise grows to a certain extent, there will be problems. After all, there are other competitors in the market, there are also management rules, there are new products constantly emerging, there are all kinds of competition and pressure, which is not something that a first-class entrepreneur can handle.
What people see is the spirit of entrepreneurship, especially after the first rendering, this spirit has the possibility of being deified, but it hides the human resources problems of the first entrepreneur, and also hides the power attribute of the first entrepreneur. In fact, no matter whether it is a first-class entrepreneur or a democratic entrepreneur, as long as he can make money, he is a good entrepreneur——— capital and power have always been evaluated in this way. This has led to the emergence of ** entrepreneurs, and they are very good at using ** to create a certain character for themselves, and it seems that they use the means of celebrity fame, use fame to gather traffic, and quickly realize it. This kind of play seems to be somewhat modern, but what cannot be ignored is the nature of entrepreneurs, the lack of control of power, the opacity of supervision and audit, the entrepreneurs' own human resources, and so on. If it is not restricted, the best entrepreneurs will emerge in endlessly, and even invest indiscriminately with capital, hype up concepts, but lose a lot of money, but their fame is very ......