GloryMagic6It's been a long time since it was released,This mobile phone brings you a relatively new design,But at present, there is a lot of controversy on the Internet is that the screen of Glorymagic6 has regressed compared to Magic5,Next, I will show you the screen flickering situation of the two。
The first is the performance of the two in low-light scenes, as can be clearly seen from the graph below, the Honor Magic5 has significantly more and thinner stripes than the Magic6. According to the current mainstream "eye protection theory" on the Internet, the finer the stripes, the lighter and faster they are, which means that the screen has a better degree of eye protection. (The stripes are thin and not easy to detect with the eyes).
Playing with the phone must not be used in low light all the time, and the use of medium light may be more frequent. At medium brightness (50%), the Honor Magic6 has noticeable streaks and darker colors. On the contrary,GloryMagic5The screen has almost no screen flicker,From this dimension,It is indeed the latter's screen quality is better。
If medium and low brightness are already the most commonly used scenarios for everyone, then add a "highest brightness" test, which completely covers the use of mobile phones in everyone's daily life. The same test results also show that the Honor Magic5 does not show noticeable streaks, which further shows that the new device is really not as good as the previous generation.
As a comparison, the Honor Magic5 has a screen parameter of 673-inch curved screen, 2688 1224P resolution, 120Hz high refresh rate, 2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming. The screen parameter of the Honor Magic6 is 678-inch curved screen, 2800 1264P resolution, 120Hz high refresh rate, 4320Hz high-frequency PWM dimming, giant rhino glass. There is no doubt that in terms of parameters, the screen of the Honor Magic6 seems to be better than the Honor Magic5, but the actual effect is different.
Of course, these two mobile phones are very cost-effective and are a good product, but the purpose of this comparison is also to tell everyone whether a mobile phone meets your own mind and reality, and you still need to experience it yourself. Simply comparing various parameters on the Internet, generally speaking, good parameters are definitely better, but dimensions such as screen tuning, sound quality, photo style and system fluency experience are more subjective.
What do you think of the difference in eye care between the two?