In the current higher education system, the writing and submission of graduate graduation** is a very important link. In order to ensure the quality and originality of the first grade, the academic community has introduced a plagiarism checking system to check the plagiarism of graduates. However, there has been controversy over whether the conclusion of the duplicate check is counted within the scope of the duplicate check when conducting the duplicate check. Let's take a look.
First of all, the main purpose of the plagiarism checking system is to detect plagiarism and plagiarism in graduation** to ensure respect for academic ethics and intellectual property rights. However, the plagiarism check conclusion is not part of the original content, it is only the result generated according to the algorithm and rules of the plagiarism checking system. Therefore, it is not in line with the purpose and principle of plagiarism checking to count the conclusion of plagiarism check as within the scope of plagiarism checking.
Second, including the results of the plagiarism check into the scope of the plagiarism check may lead to unfair results. The accuracy and credibility of the plagiarism checking system is limited, and it can only judge whether there is similar content in ** by comparing the existing literature databases. However, plagiarism checks may lead to misjudgments, which may lead to innocent** being judged as plagiarism, thus damaging the student's academic reputation and efforts.
Finally, the conclusion of the plagiarism check is excluded from the scope of the plagiarism check, which can better protect the intellectual property rights and academic independence of students. Graduation** is the summary and application of the knowledge learned by the students, which represents the students' personal research results and creative ability. The exclusion of the plagiarism check conclusion can more objectively evaluate the student's independent thinking ability and academic level, so as to better reflect the true quality of graduation and the student's efforts.
To sum up, the conclusion of the ** plagiarism check should not be included in the scope of the plagiarism check. This can better ensure academic fairness and accuracy, protect students' rights and intellectual property rights, and better evaluate students' independent thinking ability and academic level. Future research can further improve the accuracy and credibility of the plagiarism checking system to better serve academia and university education.