The U.S. imperialist ** has a relationship with Russia, what tricks will it play next?
The change of US imperialism and the "political close contact" with Russia are a major focus in the current international situation. As we all know, the United States has always played a pivotal role in global affairs, and the related foreign policy changes are directly related to world peace and stability. In this context, we can't help but ponder a major question: why does the United States engage with Russia after the change, and this contact seems to have a certain intimacy? How do we respond to such changes?
To answer this question, we must first review the situation in the United States before the United States. With Trump on the horizon, there are already some hints about his policy in key hotspots, including Europe, the Middle East and Asia. After Trump's victory, he may abandon cooperation with the EU in the European direction and rapprochement with Russia. The statement of James Stavridis, the former supreme military commander of NATO, is even more indicative that US-Russian relations may usher in a negotiation after the US ** election in November. What is the reason for all this?
Judging by Trump's political position, he has said that in the European direction, in the event of an attack on the United States, he doubts that NATO will stand up and help the United States in its defense. This seems to signal a change in the U.S. approach to Europe's security guarantees. On the business level, Trump, as a businessman, may value Russia's superiority on the battlefield between Russia and Ukraine. For him, continuing to invest in the European battlefield could be a loss-making business, and he preferred to stop his losses in time in pursuit of greater commercial interests. From this perspective, the adjustment of US policy towards Europe may be motivated by practical business considerations.
However, that's not the whole story. In the Middle East direction, Trump's statement has attracted widespread attention. Regarding the recent attack on US military bases in the Middle East, Trump criticized Biden** for his weakness and incompetence, and said that he would strike targets in Iran. He even openly declared that nuclear bombs could be used in the Middle East direction**. This series of moves makes us wonder if the situation in the Middle East will be further tense after Trump's victory, and whether Israel will become a more focused target for protection by the United States.
As for the Asian direction, Trump's remarks have caused widespread speculation. He said that he could not speak outright, but also mentioned that Taiwan had stolen all the chip business in the United States. Does this mean that Trump's policy toward Asia may be adjusted? If the United States and Russia reach a compromise in the European direction, then the United States may adjust primarily to Asia, especially given Trump's greed for Asian wealth. According to foreign media, the Trump team has begun to plan a new list of wars against China after he takes office. This makes us even more concerned about whether the U.S.-China relationship will be further strained, which will have far-reaching implications for the global economic and geopolitical landscape.
However, the complexity of the problem goes far beyond that. While considering the adjustment of US-Russian relations, we have to question whether Russia will easily compromise. Russia has its own interests in a number of directions, including Europe, the Middle East and Asia, especially in the European direction, and compromise may not be easy. Taking the interests of Europe and the Middle East, Russia will not let go either. This makes it a great challenge for the United States to negotiate with Trump, and how to satisfy Trump's appetite has become a complex and serious issue.
Finally, we should also pay attention to the actual capabilities of the United States in the Middle East direction. At present, in the "three games of chess" played by the United States in the world, Europe has shown defeat, the Middle East has not moved, and Asia may become the next focus of attention. However, with the awakening of many countries in the Middle East and the participation of more and more anti-US and anti-hegemonic forces, the position of the United States in the Middle East is gradually being challenged, which may make it difficult for it to exert its full strength in the Asian region. In addition, the $34 trillion U.S. debt crisis, which could detonate at any time, is also a risk that cannot be ignored, and will bring great uncertainty to U.S. foreign policy.
Overall, the adjustment of the foreign policy of the United States after the change of office, especially the engagement with Russia, has raised many questions and concerns. How to respond to this change requires us to make informed decisions that take into account international relations, business interests, geopolitics and other levels. This is also a serious challenge facing the international community at present, and we need to remain vigilant, pay close attention to the follow-up developments, and work together to maintain global peace and stability.