The despicable methods of the Soviet ** thieves made the Russian people helpless?
Relations between the United States and the Soviet Union began to ease after Stalin's death. In 1956, the United States proposed a cultural exchange program to invite 10,000 Soviet college students to study in the United States, all of which were borne by the United States.
Dwight D. Eisenhower once said: "One day, a new generation will take power in the Soviet Union, and it is this generation that I want to fight for." "Among the" newcomers "cultivated in the West, Yakovlev and Sakharov were the most successful.
Yakovlev was sent to Columbia University for further study, and we do not know what happened during his stay in the United States. But what we do know is that when Gorbachev visited North America in 1983, the two met in Canada and chatted all night.
After returning home, Yakovlev was appointed Minister of Propaganda of the Soviet Union, and carried out a "public" campaign, completely subverting the ideology of the Soviet Union.
Sakharov, known as the father of the Soviet hydrogen bomb, is an internationally renowned nuclear physicist who frequently visits abroad. Using the dollar as bait, the Americans succeeded in turning the scientific giant into a globally renowned figure.
He founded the magazine "Openness" in Paris, attacked the Soviet Union with various topics, and easily made a huge fortune that he could not earn by doing scientific research all his life.
Over time, he, together with Yeltsin, amended the Constitution of the USSR and removed the leadership of the CPSU. Where did the collapse of the USSR begin? The answer is varied, but it is clear that the elite of the Soviet Union did play the role of leading the way.
Five years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the American scholar David Coetz published a book in which he clearly stated that "the collapse of the Soviet system was not the result of mass uprisings and economic collapse, but from the pursuit of personal interests by the ruling elite." ”
It was true that some problems arose in the USSR in the mid-to-late eighties, but who as a great power did not experience difficult moments? However, in the face of adversity, the Soviet elites did not choose to stand up, but instead chose to lie flat, for the simple reason that their personal benefits from lying flat far outweighed the benefits they could have brought from saving the Soviet Union.
According to Gorbachev's aide Borkin, after Gorbachev came to power, the West sent a large amount of "manuscript fees", and he had $1 million in his personal account.
Gorbachev's wife, Raisa, published a book in the United States, which sold only a few hundred copies, but paid as much as $3 million. What is laughable is that Raisa does not know how to write, and the entire book is ghostwritten by a journalist named Priyakhin.
Gorbachev's monthly salary in 1991 was only 1,500 roubles, but thanks to the public "small project" manuscript fee, the couple received four or five million dollars in a short period of time, an amount equivalent to what they had earned for more than two hundred years of work.
With Yakovlev, Sakharov and Gorbachev in high positions, they are closely watched by the outside world, so some will question whether the dollar offensive is only targeting a tiny minority of elites.
However, the CIA has the most say. According to former CIA employee Francis Sanders in his book The Cultural Cold War and the Intelligence Agency, from 1963 to 1966, at least 108 "** societies" received financial assistance from the CIA, and the main task of these ** societies was to pay Soviet intellectuals for their contributions.
According to Dr. Vladilian Brov, chief researcher of the Russian Academy of Sciences, after receiving money from the West, some organizations and people write articles, publish books, hold academic conferences in the country, and represent the position of the Western ** society that contributed money.
The names of these societies are very learned and highly camouflaged, such as Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Eastern Europe.
While these associations all appear to be charitable in nature, they are actually offshoots of the CIA. A large amount of the dollar budget will flow to the "pen" of the USSR through these **.
The dollar helped the United States build a strong ** network around the Soviet Union, including more than 20 news centers, more than 80 magazines, more than 60 periodicals, and more than 2,000 radio and television stations.
Over the years, the United States has cultivated tens of thousands of authors, many of whom were Soviet citizens. Although we do not yet know the exact size of this group, it is certain that in Soviet intellectual circles it was more attractive to receive funding in dollars than in rubles.
This also explains why, after the deregulation of the press in the late Soviet Union, historical nihilism quickly swept the country. This is because it is easy to earn a high salary by writing critical articles, while writing columns allows you to live a middle-class life.
How many cultural people can resist such a good thing? The experience of the Soviet Union has taught us that human nature often does not stand the test of interests, and conscience often cannot prevail over desires.
In a country where the system is not designed to be very friendly to intellectuals and elites, there are people who are willing to be the party leading the way, even if nothing is given. Not to mention billions of billions of dollars of real gold.
The United States attaches great importance to the value of elite intellectuals. In 1987, Gorbachev ordered the cessation of "technical interference with **." In this regard, the International Broadcasting Council of the United States commented: "The cessation of interference with Western broadcasts by the Soviet Union may be more important than Gorbachev's promise to withdraw 500,000 troops from Eastern Europe." ”
Every strong country has its own unique line of defense. "In the Stalin era, although the West also conducted information warfare and ** warfare against the Soviet Union, the effect was minimal.
The reason is that Stalin had a strong voice in the ideological sphere, and the Soviet people were convinced of Stalin's line. In this case, there is no market for public knowledge.
If the ** war between the United States and the Soviet Union is seen as a war, then Khrushchev's "secret report" is a turning point. Prior to this, the United States and the Western allies had not been able to break through the Soviet Union's ** front with all their might; And after the "secret report", cracks began to appear in the international ** of the Soviet Union, which could only be maintained by relying on a high-pressure policy.
On February 25, 1956, Khrushchev completely repudiated Stalin's "secret report", which was considered by Dulles, then director of the CIA, to be "the biggest mistake Khrushchev made for the communist cause".
The CIA spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to buy the full text of the "secret report" from Israel's Mossad and used it to "send it to the world every hour in 43 languages."
What Khrushchev did not expect was that one of his small reports would become known overnight. This report made people understand that the ideology of the Soviet Union was not indestructible, and that smearing Stalin could not only not break the law, but even become a leader.
This turning point completely broke the Soviet Union's first line of defense.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the attitude of the intelligentsia changed. Although the Soviet system had problems, it was no worse than that of Europe and the United States. A critique of the new system was necessary, but the Soviet intelligentsia went too far.
They not only criticized, but also directly demolished the country, and the leader of this situation was Khrushchev. In addition, intellectuals accepted bribes from enemy countries and smeared their own country.
Such behavior was not uncommon, but in the USSR they not only did not feel ashamed, but instead developed a sense of justice. Even among the general population, there are many who understand and support them.
The USSR really failed in the competition for soft power. The Soviet elite committed unforgivable crimes against 300 million Soviet people by leaving their homes for personal gain.
In order to cover up the crime, after the collapse of the USSR, the Gorbachev clique took the initiative to cooperate with the United States, selling original documents from a large number of top-secret archives to Americans and Japanese.
Berelomov revealed that foreigners took pictures of all the materials they could find in the archives and opened them to Russian scholars after the contract expired. As a result, the vast number of declassified Soviet archives we see today were deliberately cut and sifted by the United States and Japan to falsify history, and even Russian scholars are now unable to prove their innocence due to the lack of original documents.
One might ask, why are the Japanese also involved? Because the Soviet archives have preserved a large number of bacteriological warfare materials related to Japan during World War II and the Korean War, the United States and Japan have cooperated in the in-depth processing of these materials, resulting in the widespread belief in Western academic circles that the bacteriological warfare to resist US aggression and aid Korea is a lie fabricated by China and the Soviet Union, leaving Chinese and Russian scholars with nothing to say.
New Copywriting: History is a valuable resource, but when it is tampered with, our understanding and perception can be skewed. A prime example of this is the Holodomor in Ukraine.
At that time, the entire territory of the Soviet Union suffered from famine, and Ukraine, as a grain-producing region, was the most severely affected. However, after obtaining the relevant archives, American scholars have cut and spliced them in a big way, pointing the finger at Stalin, accusing him of deliberately trapping Ukrainians in order to sow discord between Russia and Ukraine.
However, the lack of relevant archives prevented Russian scholars from forcefully refuting this, which allowed the Soviet elite to set a very negative example to the whole world: they could not only gain fame and fortune, but also not have to suffer any consequences, not even moral condemnation.
This situation has cost the Russian people dearly, while Gorbachev and others are still living comfortably. This is because their ** behavior is so cleverly done that you can't even find any evidence to prove that they committed a crime.
We should be vigilant against this kind of behavior and protect our history from being misinterpreted and exploited.