Recently, there has been a voice on the Internet that the ban on iron heads is too strict, which invisibly connives, so that they have more room to do bad things. This view, which seems reasonable, ignores the essence of the problem.
First of all, we must understand that the ban on the iron head is not a laissez-faire for his personal behavior, but a maintenance of social order. As a public figure, Iron Head has a lot of influence on his behavior. His misdeeds can easily mislead the public, especially young people who have not yet developed sound values. Therefore, behaviors that violate public morality and public order and good customs must be stopped and punished.
Second, for unscrupulous merchants, we can't just hope that the problem will be solved through connivance. Connivance will only embolden them even more, ignoring laws and regulations and infringing on the rights and interests of consumers. Unscrupulous businesses should be punished in accordance with the law, and the punishment should be increased to form an effective deterrent. At the same time, strengthen supervision, raise the threshold for market access, and curb the emergence of unscrupulous businesses from the source.
In addition, we should also strengthen public education and raise consumers' awareness of the protection of their rights and interests. Let consumers understand their rights and interests, and know how to protect their own interests. In this way, even if there are unscrupulous merchants, consumers can bravely stand up and protect their legitimate rights and interests.
To sum up, the ban on iron heads is not to condone unscrupulous businessmen, but a necessary means to maintain social order. We need to take more vigorous measures to curb unscrupulous businesses. At the same time, strengthen public education and raise consumers' awareness of the protection of their rights and interests. Only in this way can we truly achieve a fair, just and honest market environment.