On February 26, Palestinian Prime Minister Ashtiyah announced the collective resignation of the current Pakistani and has submitted his resignation to Palestinian Abbas.
This matter cannot be viewed simply from within Palestine, but should be viewed in conjunction with a series of recent news events surrounding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
Let's start with Ashtiyeh's background, a Palestinian politician who is a typical centrist figure in Palestine and has always advocated cooperation between the Fatah Palestinian liberation movement and the Palestinian Islamic resistance movement Hamas, to form a Palestinian coalition regime.
Therefore, Ashtiyeh's announcement of his resignation means that the tacit understanding between "Fatah" and "Hamas" has been broken, and the two camps have officially moved towards **. Ashtiyeh also raised this point in his resignation, calling on the Palestinian Authority to take new political measures in the military conflict in the Gaza Strip.
His appeal to the Palestinian Authority to extend its rule to the entire Palestinian territory was implicated by Abbas's influence over the Gaza Strip. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is now a mess, but it is basically a battle between the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Hamas forces, and the Palestinian Authority has no role in the Gaza Strip.
This issue is not an independent news event, there are two more news about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the same period:One is an active U.S. Air Force pilot at the Israeli embassy in the U.S.** and demanding the liberation of Palestine from the United States. On the other hand, the United States once again voted its only negative vote on the Security Council's draft resolution calling for a ceasefire between Palestine and Israel.
The fact that the active US pilots are at the Israeli Embassy in the United States actually reveals that there is a sharp difference between the views of the United States on this Palestinian-Israeli conflict and that of the United States. In the United States, both Republicans and Democrats have always been very clear on the issue of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, that is, they firmly support Israel and Israel's military action against the Gaza Strip.
However, the attitude of the American people on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is diametrically opposed to that of the American political elites, and they are very different from the European people, from the initial condemnation of Hamas for launching terrorist attacks against Israel, to the tacit acquiescence of Hamas's actions as self-defense, and the recognition of Hamas's anti-Israel importance, which has led to a serious rift between the American people and the United States, but the negative effects of this tear were not reflected at the first time. In the case of the American active-duty military personnel, this tearing effect will be further highlighted, and the United States will begin to bear the impact of public opposition.
Then there is the United States' veto of the draft resolution on a ceasefire in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. This is actually the optimal solution based on US interests in the Middle East. Since the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has been fought, the number in the Gaza Strip has risen to 100,000. The international community's widespread condemnation and Israel's efforts to spread the battlefield bigger and bigger, Israel is already a little unable to hold on, and Jordan, Lebanon, Iran, and even Turkey and Egypt are all eyeing Israel and continue to fight, and in the end it will definitely be Israel that suffers. But there is only one country that can change this situation, and that is the United States. The United States is now faced with the question of whether it wants to end up or not.
Judging from the current situation, the possibility of the end is not very large, and even the allies of the United States have seen clearly on this issue that the Middle East is now a pit, and no matter who enters it, it is guaranteed that it will not be able to get out, including the United States itself. The United States also understands, but if it does not end up, Israel will be a dead end. So between the end and the compromise, the United States has only one choice, and that is to compromise. And there are already signs of this action.
Two months ago, Hamas convened a meeting in Cairo to discuss the post-disaster reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, and the other core issue of the discussion was to get the current Palestinian Abbas and create a technocratic in the Authority.
The Washington Post also reported the news, saying that Arab countries are already discussing the issue of Palestinian statehood, and these news may be announced in the coming months. However, on this issue, the United States has not jumped out to express its opposition to this plan, so in the future, although the United States will not explicitly show its support for Palestinian statehood out of support for its ally Israel, it will also not oppose it.
On the issue of returning to the resignation of Palestinian Prime Minister Ashtiyeh, in fact, he is not optimistic about Fatah's future ruling position, and even Fatah has no ability to govern at all. Because Fatah's armed forces are already openly supporting Hamas, and have even followed Hamas, Hamas has become even more popular in the face of the Palestinian people's agitation. In other words, Fatah no longer has a basis for governance, and Ashtiyeh, as a centrist, must choose to resign, because there is no room for him to operate.