According to the Daily Economic News, on February 13, local time, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that Jack Smith, a special prosecutor of the Department of Justice, should respond to the appeal of the former Republican Donald Trump related to his immunity. Trump filed an emergency appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 12 to freeze the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia's U.S. Circuit ruling denying his immunity.
According to CCTV News, Special Counsel Smith filed four charges with Trump in August last year for linking him to the "Capitol Hill riot," and the case was originally scheduled for March 4**. However, due to the appeal process, the presiding judge, Chutkan, has officially announced the postponement of the trial.
Trump's lawsuit stems from a series of controversial actions after the 2020 election. At that time, his attempt to overturn the election results sparked widespread doubts and criticism from all walks of life. Jack Smith, as special counsel, led the investigation, accusing Trump of trying to subvert democracy and undermine the integrity of the election. Trump has vehemently denied this and tried to use his immunity to get rid of the charges in criminal proceedings.
However, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia for the Federal Circuit ruled on the 6th of this month, holding that Trump could not be exempted from criminal prosecution charges on the grounds of immunity. The ruling is undoubtedly a heavy blow to Trump. It is reported that in August 2022, the FBI searched as many as 110,000 documents, some of which are "classified" or even "top secret" documents, should have been returned to the United States when Trump leaves office. Trump faces nearly 100 years in prison on 37 felony counts of obstruction of justice and withholding documents and records for keeping documents and records privately.
But then again, after Trump was exposed to privately storing ** documents, Biden was also exposed to privately storing ** documents during his tenure as a member of the US Senate and vice president. Therefore, if Trump is convicted, then the Republican Party will inevitably hold on to Biden, and the possibility of "losing both" on both sides in the end cannot be ruled out.
On February 14, according to Xinhua News Agency, on the 13th local time, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that in response to the appeal of the former Republican ** Donald Trump related to his ** immunity, according to Reuters, the judges asked Smith in a brief order to respond to Trump's request before 4 pm local time on the 20th, and the latter could submit a reply in advance.
According to the report, Trump filed an urgent appeal to the Federal Supreme Court on the 12th, applying to freeze the ruling of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit of the District of Columbia to reject his immunity.
Trump's federal ** case is the pinnacle of a political drama, and the intervention of the U.S. Supreme Court is like a sword hanging over the scales, making the entire election situation even more confusing. This is not only a contest between the two political camps, but also a test related to the stability of the US national system.
This judicial storm is like a tense and intense suspense film, and every step of the development has attracted the attention of the world. Trump's supporters expect justice, while Biden's camp is convinced of the legitimacy of the election results. The intervention of the Supreme Court has undoubtedly injected more suspense into this political drama and put people's faith in the rule of law to the test again.
Trump's legal team insists that acts taken while in office should be exempt from criminal liability, and therefore Trump should enjoy immunity. However, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that Trump's appeal request could not be exempted from criminal prosecution charges on the grounds of immunity. This ruling has aroused widespread attention and repercussions from all walks of life. The battle over Trump's immunity is not only a legal dispute, but also an important dispute about legal justice and judicial fairness. In this legal battle, the court will weigh power and responsibility, rights and obligations, and safeguard judicial fairness and social justice.
In this contest, Trump's legal team has constantly used **immunity as a talisman to try to get him from the law. But the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's ruling put their plans in jeopardy. In the face of the law, Trump's political outlook looks bleak. However, the political struggle never ceased. Trump's team of lawyers is constantly seeking postponements and postponements, trying to find a silver lining in the maelstrom of the law. But the pressure of justice makes their efforts seem so insignificant. In this contest, the decision of the US Supreme Court will be a key blow. In the face of the trial of the law, Trump's political fate has long been sealed.
The shadow of the 2024 election has already loomed over the United States. Trump's remarks at a recent rally have sparked widespread concern and concern in the international community. He said that he would encourage Russia to take action against NATO members, which caused widespread concern and concern in the international community. Biden lashed out at Trump's remarks, calling them "dangerous and shocking" and trying to defend America's international standing and values with a tough stance. This political contest is not just a contest between two politicians, but also a contest about the international order and international relations.
According to reports, Putin publicly commented on the United States for the first time in 2024**. Asked which of the two is "more beneficial" to Russia, Putin responded: "Biden, he is more experienced, more prescient, an old-school politician. He added, "But we'll work with any U.S. ** that the American people trust." "I met Biden in Switzerland three years ago, and some people said at the time that he was incompetent, but I didn't see anything like that," Putin said. He also mentioned that Biden hit his head when he went down in June 2023, "Well, which of us hasn't hit his head too much? As for Trump, Putin said that the former is evaluated as an "unconventional political figure" and that he has his own views on how the United States should develop relations with its allies.
In response to Putin's remarks about which Biden or Trump is elected as the most beneficial to Russia, Trump responded the next day, saying that it was Putin's great praise for him, and he was flattered.
Speaking to supporters in South Carolina on Feb. 15, Trump responded: "Actually, Russia's Putin just gave me a lot of praise. He just said that he would prefer Biden to Trump to be the **. It's a compliment. Trump stressed that while he got along well with Putin when he took office, Putin did not want me to be elected, and his remark was "evidence that he will be tougher on American rivals than the current one." ”
Some observers believe the Supreme Court is likely to uphold Trump's ability to run for the first place. This decision may have obvious political skewers, but it may also trigger broader societal concerns. The daunting challenges facing the U.S. justice system are also highlighted in this case.
The Trump case will have far-reaching implications for the future. Regardless of the final ruling, it will be a serious test for the U.S. judicial and political system. This battle over immunity could be a watershed moment for the world, sparking more concern and discussion. May the just sword of the law guide America toward a more just and peaceful future.
As events unfold, society has expressed different expectations and concerns about Trump's legal fate and court decisions. From election disputes to legal disputes over identity, this dispute affects everyone who cares about American politics. Regardless of the court's final ruling, this legal storm will become part of America's political history. We may need to think more deeply and look beyond the legal dimension to focus on the responsibilities of leaders and societal expectations of the exercise of power. Whatever the outcome, it will trigger a deep rethinking of the rule of law and leadership responsibilities. This event will leave a lasting mark on the history of American politics, triggering deep reflections on the rule of law, power, and responsibility.
February** Dynamic Incentive Program