The situation in the Middle East has heated up again, and the contradictions between the United States and Iran have been intensifying.
The situation in the Middle East has always been complex, with countries struggling for control of the region. An illegal U.S. base in Syria was attacked, resulting in the death of 3 U.S. people and the wounding of 25 others. Biden blamed the attack on civilian forces behind Iran, and he said he would fight back. However, it should be noted that while the United States is resolute in its approach to Iran, the Biden administration has softened its approach to Iran, suggesting that the United States is undergoing a strategic contraction and is beginning to withdraw its troops from the Middle East.
The terrorist attack is an important signal that the dominant role of the United States in the Middle East no longer exists. In recent decades, the United States has always regarded the Middle East as its "backyard" and has sought its hegemonic position in the region by intervening in the region by force and interfering in regional internal affairs. However, in recent years, the rise of various forces in the region and the growing national consciousness of the United States have led to a decline in its standing in the world. The United States must face up to the fact that the situation in the Middle East is beyond the control of the United States alone, and the intervention of other powers and the rise of regional forces have put the United States in an increasingly embarrassing situation.
The United States provides aid to Iran and provides assistance to Iran.
At a time when tensions are becoming very tense in the Middle East, the United States has unexpectedly provided military assistance to Iran. Previously, the United States seized about $6 billion in Iranian money and has tightened control over how Iran uses the money. However, the latest information suggests that Iran was finally freed and aided. This move is a sign that the United States is showing goodwill to Iran and lifting all kinds of constraints on Iran.
Iran's Prime Minister Abdollahian learned about the situation of Qatari Prime Minister and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman through **. Mohammed informed Iran that an agreement had been signed between Qatar and the United States guaranteeing that it would honour an agreement whereby Iran would receive the unfrozen funds and comply with the relevant laws in accordance with the agreement between the Bank of Iran** and the Bank of Qatar**. In other words, the $6 billion will be disbursed quickly, and Iran can spend it as much as it wants.
This news has a profound significance for the situation in the Middle East. How Iran will spend this money is a matter of concern to everyone. Given that the situation in the Middle East remains dire, it is highly likely that Iran will use the money for military purposes to increase its voice in the region. In this way, the United States is financing Iran, in fact, financing the army in disguise. The United States may be aware of the problem, but its decision to let the money flow out can be seen as a signal of goodwill to Iran.
The United States will resort to a strategy of less military intervention.
Judging by the actions of the United States to assist Iran, the United States is engaged in a strategic tightening in the Middle East. The United States has carried out large-scale military involvement in the Middle East in an attempt to maintain its position as a regional hegemon by intervening militarily in the internal affairs of the region. But in recent years, the United States has been plagued by the realization that it is too costly to maintain such a military and that the region has become increasingly complex and unstable.
The United States is now confronted with the fact that it is no longer possible to continue military intervention in the Middle East. Whether in Iraq or Afghanistan, the troops in Iraq have become a meeting point of nationalism, putting great pressure on the United States and causing great losses. So the United States has made the decision to gradually withdraw from the Middle East to prevent a situation as embarrassing as the withdrawal from Afghanistan from happening again.
This tactical atrophy is not a complete abandonment of the Middle East by the United States, but rather a desire to intervene in the region in a smarter and more flexible way, while also avoiding its military intervention and transgressions in the region. At the same time, the United States also wants to maintain a stable and cooperative relationship with the major regional powers in order to prevent further contradictions and instability.
The defeat of the United States in the Middle East.
U.S. influence in the Middle East is waning, even to the point where it has to withdraw. In recent decades, the United States has been striving to maintain its hegemonic position in the Middle East by its military power and power. However, due to the rise of regional forces and the strategic adjustment of the United States in the Middle East, the United States' voice and discourse power in the region have weakened.
There are a variety of reasons for this shift. First, the international community is increasingly dissatisfied with foreign interference, focusing on its own development and protecting its own interests. Second, the Middle East border problem is still serious, domestic forces compete with each other, and the United States has a great influence on the region. In addition, due to the rise of regional powers such as Iran and the redistribution of power in the Middle East, the United States' voice on this issue is also gradually declining.
This strategic downsizing of the United States is not a complete abandonment of the Middle East by the United States, but only an indication that the United States will reorganize its position and tactics in the region. The United States must face up to the fact that the Middle East is no longer the only one that is the United States, and that the United States must rethink its geographical strategy due to the intervention of other powers and the rise of power in the region.
Conclusion. In short, the situation in the Middle East is already unfavorable, and the United States is facing severe tests such as the grim situation and the decline of its international status. The injection of US capital into Iran is seen as a change in its strategy and goodwill, as well as a strategic contraction and retreat of US policy in the Middle East. The situation in the Middle East continues to develop, a new order in the Middle East may gradually take shape, and the confrontation and confrontation between various forces will become more intense, which is of profound significance to regional stability and peace. As observers and participants in the Middle East, we should always be vigilant and actively seek common cooperation in the region, jointly address regional issues, and jointly safeguard world peace and stability.