In the spring of 2006, ChinaAgricultural taxesDeclared the end, this tax has been closely related to the survival of feudal dynasties since ancient times. However, this also means:FarmersSince then, he has been freed from a heavy burden and has become a beneficiary. However,Agricultural taxesBehind the cancellation lies a hidden truth. This article will reveal the secret for youAgricultural taxesCancel the truth, showFarmersAsTax reformThe biggest victims.
Agricultural taxesThe cancellation has not really abatedFarmers, which in turn leads to an increase in the amount of other costs it bears. In order to fill the financial vacancy, the local government has increased other service fees and introduced new operating feesFarmersMake an allocation. For example,Land use feesWater conservancyEducationSurcharges and other miscellaneous fees are constantly emerging, which makes it possibleFarmersThe burden has not really been reduced.
In addition,Agricultural taxesAfter cancellation, it should have been improvedRuralThere is misappropriation and misuse of funds for infrastructure and public services. In some places, this part of the funds is used for illegal purposes such as personal corruption and merit projects, resulting inFarmersYou can't get the benefits you deserve. This makes:FarmersThe loss of trust in ** and doubts about the benefits of the policy are further exacerbatedFarmersThe dilemma.
Agricultural taxesThe cancellation may also affect:Farmersmarket competitiveness. After the reduction of local ** tax revenue, it is used for:AgricultureInvestments in support and services have been reduced, including in areas such as science and technology promotion, breed improvement, and disaster subsidies. This directly affectsAgricultural productsThe quality and yield are limitedFarmersThe possibility of increasing revenue.
In addition,Agricultural taxesThe cancellation was not involvedRuralDeepEconomyStructural issues. For example, the land system has not been fundamentally reformedFarmersThe right to use the land is still restricted, and the land cannot be fully excavatedEconomyPotential. Therefore, even if it is no longer paidAgricultural taxesFarmersIt is still difficult to obtain a stable and sufficient income from the land.
In summary,Agricultural taxesThe cancellation of the although, to a certain extent, mitigatedFarmersThe tax burden, however, is radically improvedFarmersThe living conditions require more efforts. **Further adjustments are requiredFiscal and tax policies, liftFarmersThe standard of living, enhancedAgricultureCompetitiveness, reformRuralEconomyStructure. Only then,FarmersIn order to truly transform from a beneficiary of the policyAgriculturePromoter of modernization.
Agricultural taxesThe cancellation has not really abatedFarmersThe burden, on the contrary,FarmersOther costs are increasing. In order to make up for the financial gap, the local government has raised other service fees and introduced new operating feesFarmersMake apportionments.
Land use feesis one of them. InAgrarian reformAfter that,FarmersThere is a fee for the use of the land. Originally, it was to promote the rational use and development of land resources, but it deviated from the original intentionLand use feesThe increase has becomeFarmersA new burden. FarmersOften, it is necessary toLand use feesPaying extra fees, which reduces their motivation to use the land, is also detrimentalAgriculturedevelopment.
Water conservancy** tooFarmersA cost to be incurred. Water conservancyFacilities toAgricultureProduction is crucial, yet this increase in ** givesFarmersAdds a burden. FarmersPayment is requiredWater conservancy** For the maintenance and construction of irrigation systems, etc., which are purely dependentAgricultureproducedFarmersIt is undoubtedly worse than not.
EducationSurcharges have also become exorbitantFarmersAnother burden. Obligation to provideEducationIt was supposed to be free, but due to the financial gap,FarmersPayments are often requiredEducationA surcharge is used to subsidize the school's expenses. This makes it possible for some impoverished areasFarmersCan't afford itEducationfees, children's way to school is blockedEducationEquity has also been compromised.
In addition to the above-mentioned fees, there are many other fees that are gradually being addedFarmersamong the burdens. For example, road maintenance fees and environmental protection fees have increased virtuallyFarmerscost of living, giveFarmersofEconomyStress adds no small burden.
The increase in these charges has enabledFarmersLife becomes more strained, increasing their burden, making itAgricultural taxesThe benefits of cancellation become insignificant. FarmersofEconomyThe situation has not really improved, and the plight they face has become even more severe.
Agricultural taxesAfter cancellation, it was supposed to be used for improvementRuralMisappropriation and misuse of funds for infrastructure and public services are widespread. This makes:FarmersThe inability to enjoy the benefits they deserve further exacerbates their plight.
On the one hand, some places** use this part of the funds for improper purposes such as personal corruption and merit projects. They excuse improvementRuralinfrastructure and public services, but in fact embroiling the funds into their own pockets and abusing public power. This kind of behavior not only damages the image of **, but also seriously damagesFarmersso that they cannot enjoy the benefits that should belong to them.
On the other hand, some localities** put this money into unrealistic merit projects. They ignore it for the sake of political performanceRuralThe real need for infrastructure. Build large-scale, high-profile projects without focusing on the grassrootsFarmersreal needs, making this funding impossibleFarmersDeliver real benefits.
The misappropriation and misuse of funds has been underminedFarmersinterests, also lostFarmersTrust in **. FarmersDoubts about the benefits of policies and confusion about the future. This makes them in:AgricultureThe process of development and modernization has become more difficult.
Agricultural taxesThe cancellation of the pairFarmersThe competitiveness of the market has also had a negative impact. The decrease in tax revenues of the local ** resulted inAgricultureReduced investment in support and services. This is largely restrictiveFarmersPosition and ability in the market competition.
The promotion of science and technology is to improveAgricultureAn important means of competitiveness, however canceledAgricultural taxesHowever, the investment in technology promotion has decreased significantly. There should have been more input on improving crop varieties, improvingAgricultural productsquality and yield, but the reality isFarmersIt is not possible to enjoy such benefits. This makes:FarmersCannot be compared with others in the marketAgricultural productsProducers contend and fall into a competitive disadvantage.
Disaster subsidies tooFarmersOne of the most important ways to increase your income. However, canceledAgricultural taxesThe amount of disaster subsidies has also been reduced. This has a direct impactFarmersUnder uncontrollable factors such as natural disastersEconomyRisk tolerance, make:FarmersThey are unable to bear the losses caused by disasters, which reduce their incomes and living standards.
Agricultural taxesThe impact of the abolition on farmers' market competitiveness is not limited to the promotion of science and technology and disaster subsidies, but also involves many other aspects, such as variety improvementAgricultureMechanization, quality inspection, etc. Investments in these areas have been reduced and limitedFarmersThe position and ability in the market competition make them inAgricultural productsSales and ** formation in a disadvantageous position.
Agricultural taxesThe cancellation was not resolvedRuralDeepEconomyStructural issues. RuralFundamental reform of the agrarian system has not been carried outFarmersThe right to use the land is still restricted, and the land cannot be fully utilizedEconomyPotential.
Therefore, even if it is canceledAgricultural taxesFarmersIt is still difficult to obtain a stable and sufficient income from land. Their land use rights are limited, making it difficult to carry out comprehensive workAgricultureoperation, unable to make effective use of land resources. This makes:FarmersThe income of ** single,EconomyGrowth is sluggish and difficult to followAgricultureto achieve sustainable development.
In addition to the land issue,RuralThere are still thereAgricultural productsProcessingAgricultureservices andFarmersskills training, etc. These problems hinderRuralEconomyof diversity andFarmersThe increase in income has constrainedRuralEconomyof modern development.
InRuralDeepEconomyStructural problems have not been fundamentally reformed, even if they have been eliminatedAgricultural taxesFarmersIt is still difficult to get out of the predicament of poverty and low income, and it is difficult to achieve real problemsAgricultureModernization andFarmersof all-round development.
Agricultural taxesThe cancellation was mitigated to a certain extentFarmersbut also brings other problems. FarmersIt is necessary to bear the increase in other costs, and at the same time face the misappropriation and misuse of funds. Agricultural taxesThe cancellation also affectedFarmersmarket competitiveness, limiting their ability to increase revenue. In addition, the unresolved problems of the deep-seated economic structure in the rural areas have also made the problemFarmersDifficult to get fromAgricultureObtain a stable and adequate income.
Therefore, further adjustments are requiredFiscal and tax policies, liftFarmersThe standard of living, enhancedAgricultureCompetitiveness, reformRuralEconomyStructure. Only then,FarmersIn order to truly transform from a beneficiary of the policyAgriculturePromoter of modernization. At the same time, it is necessary to strengthen supervision and management to prevent the occurrence of misappropriation and abuse of funds. In addition, there is a need to increase the number of people who need to doRuralEconomyStructural issues are studied and reformed intensively in the land systemAgricultural productsProcessingAgricultureThe service industry and other aspects to make positive explorations and attempts. Only by solving these problems can we makeFarmersReally benefitedTax reform, implementationAgricultureModernization andFarmersof all-round development.