The United States has publicly acknowledged the death of soldiers, and retaliation against Iran is about to begin. However, in less than a day, Biden changed his attitude and said that there would be no war with Iran. The incident may have been caused by a human error, raising questions about the U.S. military's air defense system. At the same time, piecemeal retaliation against local armed forces will not solve the problem, and only action against Iran, which supports them, will solve the fundamental problem. Recently, there was an incident in the United States in which a soldier died, which caused national concern. Biden quickly pointed the finger at Iran, claiming that he would retaliate. Soon after, however, ** changed its stance, saying that it would not seek war with Iran. This sudden incident has raised questions about the US military's air defense system. According to reports, the attack may have been caused by human error. The air defense systems of the US military did not perform well in response to drone attacks and could not defend effectively. This raises concerns about the technological capabilities of the US military.
After all, the use of drones in modern warfare is becoming more and more common, and if the US military cannot respond effectively, it will pose a serious threat to the lives and safety of soldiers. Moreover, piecemeal retaliation against local armed forces does not solve the problem. While these armed groups may be carrying out Iranian orders, they are only tools behind Iran's backs. Only by attacking Iran, which is behind them, can the fundamental problem be solved. Therefore, the United States should take more decisive action to hold Iran accountable and impose sanctions against it. However, this incident has also raised questions about the decision-making of the United States. Why did ** claim at the outset that it would retaliate, but change its position in a short period of time? Does this mean that there was a lapse or uncertainty in the handling of this incident? These questions need to be answered in order to guarantee the public's trust in the public and the protection of the public. In addition to questioning **, this incident has also raised concerns about Iran.
Iran has been accused of supporting terrorist activities and trying to destabilize the Middle East region. If Iran is indeed involved in this attack, then the international community should take more resolute action to stop Iran's evil deeds. In short, the death of the soldier raised questions about the US air defense system and thought about the decision-making of the United States. Piecemeal retaliation against local militants will not solve the problem, only by attacking Iran, which is behind them, will solve the fundamental problem. Now, we need to find answers to protect the interests of *** and the public. The Iran Challenge for the United States: Biden's Tough ChoiceIran has always been an important issue in U.S. foreign policy, and Biden faces a difficult choice on the Iran challenge. Iran's nuclear program, regional expansion, and threats to U.S. interests make it imperative for Biden to think carefully about how to respond.
Tensions between the United States and Iran have a long history, with intractable differences between the two countries since Iran's Islamic Revolution in 1979. While the 2015 Iran nuclear deal eased tensions for a time, Trump** unilaterally withdrew from the deal in 2018 and imposed a series of sanctions that put US-Iran relations in trouble again. After Biden succeeded to the throne, a return to the Iran nuclear deal became an important goal of his foreign policy. However, the Iranian side insisted that the sanctions be lifted first, while the United States demanded that Iran first return to compliance with the terms of the agreement. This has led to an impasse between the two sides, and the negotiations have not made substantial progress. Against this backdrop, Iran's ** elections held in June 2021 attracted global attention. Iran's conservative candidate, Ebrahimi Raisi, won the election, further deepening U.S. concerns about Iranian policy.
Raisi expressed hostility toward the United States during the election and stressed that he would continue to support Iran's nuclear program as well as resist foreign interference. This makes Biden have to be more cautious in the face of Iran. However, in the face of the Iranian threat, Biden must make a decision. Retaliation against Iran could lead to the collapse of U.S. hegemony, as it could trigger regional conflicts and lead to a spike in oil prices, which in turn could weaken U.S. influence around the world. But it is also not stable without retaliation**, as it could be seen as a sign of weakness and further incentives for Iran's aggressive behavior. Biden's decision will determine the fate of American hegemony, and we are witnessing history. They need to find a balance between defending their national interests while avoiding getting drawn into military conflict. This requires a comprehensive and integrated strategy that includes the combined use of diplomatic, economic and military means. From a diplomatic point of view, Biden should continue to push forward negotiations on the Iranian nuclear issue and seek cooperation with European allies.
Despite the differences between the positions of European countries on Iran and those of the United States, they remain important partners of the United States in resolving the Iranian issue. By strengthening cooperation with Europe, the United States can increase pressure on Iran and provide more solutions. In addition, Biden should also seek cooperation with regional allies. Stability in the Middle East is vital to U.S. interests, so cooperation with countries such as Saudi Arabia, Israel, and the UAE is essential. By strengthening relations with these countries, the United States can form a united front to exert greater pressure on Iran and protect its own interests in the region. From an economic point of view, the continuation of sanctions is an effective tool. Trump's sanctions have already dealt a severe blow to Iran's economy, and the continuation of sanctions could further exacerbate Iran's economic woes.
However, Biden needs to be careful not to impose sanctions on ordinary Iranians, which could spark domestic discontent and further exacerbate tensions between the United States and Iran. In addition, Biden should also consider the use of military means. However, before taking any military action, Biden must carefully assess the risks and consequences. Military action could lead to an escalation of regional conflicts and could have a negative impact on U.S. influence around the world. Therefore, Biden should exercise restraint and seek a diplomatic and economic solution. In short, Biden has a difficult choice to make when confronted with the challenge of Iran. They need to find a balance between defending their national interests while avoiding getting drawn into military conflict. Through a combination of diplomatic, economic and military means, Biden can help the United States on the Iran issue.