About Henan chess player Yan Moumou".BathtubThe "door" incident aroused people's curiosity about the "". Most people are high for thisTechnologyI don't know anything about the product, what it is, how to use it, and what it does. This raises more questions about what exactly "" are and why they allow players to cheat in matches.
It is understood that the "" is a kind of ** that can be controlled**Sphinctercontraction and relaxation to achieve well-beingHealth careand ** effect of the product. Generally, it is made of a soft material and has a bead-like appearance. To use, simply insert ** inside, by squeezing or relaxingSphincterto achieve the corresponding purpose. It can soothe anorectal problems such as hemorrhoids, constipation, etc., for **orHealth careIt helps somewhat.
For most people, andSphincterIt is a more intimate area, so their understanding of is very limited. However, because of this privacy, have also become a potential cheating tool. It is said that by controlling **SphincterPlayers can pass on codes and receive messages to gain an advantage in the game. This kind of cheating is not only against the spirit of competition, but also condemned.
In Yan's so-and-so".BathtubOne of the most eye-catching focuses of the incident was the cancellation of the championship and the loss of 100,000 yuan in prize money caused by cheating. Everyone condemned this kind of cheating, believing that it seriously undermined the fairness of the game. Choosing to cheat to win is a deeply unfair act for other players and for the tournament as a whole.
However, in Yan's case, there is currently no conclusive evidence that he used "" to cheat. The Chinese Chess Association issued an announcement saying that it could not confirm that Yan had cheated, but still canceled all his awards and bonuses in the competition. The penalty has sparked controversy and raised questions about its fairness.
Yan Moumou expressed his voice on **, saying that he would appeal the punishment. He said that he did not understand the "" and the Morse code, and stressed that his chess level was accumulated with more than 40 years of chess experience, and there was no need to cheat. He admitted that he drank a lot of beer the night before the game, which may have caused him to have diarrhea the next morning. In the actual occurrenceBathtubAfter pooping, he tried to clean upBathtub, but becauseBathtubProblems with drain valves, which cannot be cleaned thoroughly.
The person who lived with Yan Moumou also certified the incident, saying that Yan Moumou drank a lot of beer that night, which may have caused his bad stomach to cause the next morning. They confirmed that Yan was thereBathtubInside was cleaned up, but due toBathtubThe opening is small, and there are some embarrassments that cannot be cleaned up.
Regarding the view of the punishment, Yan Moumou believes that it is unfair for him to make such a severe punishment just based on the reasons spread on the Internet. He said that he is nearly 50 years old, a rural person, a county person, and knows nothing about "", and has no motive or need to use it. He has always relied on his chess skills to achieve results in the tournament and does not need to cheat.
At present, Yan Moumou is preparing to file an appeal on the punishment, hoping to restore the truth. He firmly believes in his innocence and pursues justice and fair results. After all, a person's career and reputation are very important, and nothing can easily ruin a person's everything just because of an unsubstantiated rumor.
Yan's appeal has triggered people's thinking about the punishment result, and everyone is worried about whether the stick is too heavy and whether it is in line with the principle of justice. After all, the basis for this punishment is simply ".Bathtubstool", and there is no conclusive evidence of the existence of "cheating". For a person's quality, it can only be regarded as a bad behavior at best, and should not affect the result of the competition and the qualification for participation. Therefore, there are calls for greater caution in dealing with such incidents, which need to be supported by sufficient evidence.
In this case".BathtubThe truth has still not been fully revealed. Judging from the current news, there is no conclusive evidence that Yan Moumou used "" to cheat. As a result, the outcome of the penalty may change due to a lack of evidence. This also reiterates the importance of a fair trial, and that a fair verdict should be made on the basis of evidence, rather than being made lightly and excessively severe.
Whether it is Yan Moumou or the Chinese Chess Association, they should actively cooperate to clarify the truth. Only when there is sufficient evidence can a fair verdict be made and the fairness of the competition and the protection of the rights and interests of the participants can be ensured.
Finally, we want to highlight the seriousness of cheating, as well as for itContest RulesThe importance of the matter. Cheating is not only unfair to other players, but also a desecration of the spirit of the game. Cheating should be severely condemned and punished. However, when dealing with such incidents, we must also follow the principles of justice and fairness, ensure that no innocent is wronged, and everyone is treated fairly. Only in this way can the fairness of the competition and the dignity of the participants be guaranteed.