The turmoil over the dismissal of the commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army, Zaluzhny, continues to ferment and has attracted widespread attention. The delay in finalizing this decision shows that there is a great deal of resistance, and that the intensification of this resistance could lead to unintended consequences. Zaluzhny occupies a very sensitive position, holding the leadership of the Ukrainian army, which is currently in a period of turmoil and could have serious consequences if it is moved. If Zaluzhny had some ideas, or if his supporters had forced him out, the situation could have gone in a different direction and the situation in Ukraine could change completely. For now, the situation could become even more complex and unavoidable if decisions are not made quickly.
Sergei Krivonos, a retired general of the Ukrainian army and former deputy secretary of the Ukrainian *** committee, strongly opposed Zaluzhny's dismissal, according to the Russian news agency Sputnik. Krivonos sharply criticized Zelensky on the program of Ukrainian television, arguing that the replacement of Zaluzhny was unnecessary, and Zelensky should first consider replacing himself. Krivonos noted that Zelensky himself is incompetent in principle in dealing with the duties related to the constitution and the mobilization law, and he has many more problems than Zaluzhny, which led to the complete paralysis of the Ukrainian economy. Does this remark that has spread on Ukrainian TV mean that there have been cracks in the ** barrier erected by Zelensky?
Zaluzhny's dismissal has aroused widespread trust, and the reason why Zelensky wants to replace him shows that he believes that Zaluzhny has posed a great threat to himself.
Facts have also proved that Zaluzhny's popularity in Ukraine is much higher than Zelensky's. Zaluzhny has surpassed Zelensky in previous trust polls to become one of the most trusted leaders of Ukrainians. Since Zaluzhny has always adhered to the principle of separation of military and government, his prestige in the Ukrainian army also far exceeds that of Zelensky. If Zaluzhny does something, he is expected to mobilize a considerable force. Zaluzhny represents the traditional Ukrainian military, and the old generals, like Krivonos, are also supporters of Zaluzhny. Zaluzhny's power should not be underestimated, and if the situation develops too rigidly and does not give Zaluzhny any leeway, it could lead to a fierce internal conflict, and it could even turn into a civil war.
Ukraine** Zelensky has also struggled in this situation. After the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, Zelensky has been working hard to build a personal image, and once sat firmly on the throne. As the war dragged on, the inadequacy of Zelensky's leadership was gradually exposed. He is too obsessed with public appearances and heavy-handedness, but lacks the ability to truly lead the Ukrainian people to victory. As the war continues, Zelensky's exposed problems become more and more serious, and his ** throne has become precarious.
To keep his position, Zelensky chose to take action against Zaluzhny, which shows his inner turmoil. Even if Zaluzhny is really sent to the UK as ambassador, it will be difficult for Zelensky to consolidate his position for a long time.
The whole incident exposed Zelensky's weakness, and his self-confidence began to waver. At this critical juncture, Zelensky had to resort to radical measures in an attempt to assert his leadership.
Ukraine's choice to dismiss the commander-in-chief of the army is not only a change in management, but also a matter of Ukraine's future direction. Zaluzhny's dismissal has aroused great concern at home and abroad, as well as dissatisfaction among the military and the people in the country. The strength and morale of the Ukrainian army are related to the security and stability of the country, and Zelensky's dismissal of Zaluzhny could trigger destabilizing factors and lead the country into an even more chaotic state.
It is worth noting that Zelensky has been committed to controlling ** at home and shaping his image through **propaganda. Does the strong opposition from some people such as Krivornos appear on Ukrainian TV that the ** barrier that Zelensky has been maintaining has begun to crack? This could be a sign of a change in Ukraine's internal political landscape, and that pluralism may lead to a more open and just social environment for the country.
Zelensky's decision to dismiss Zaluzhny is deeply involved and has a bearing on Ukraine's political stability. On the one hand, Zaluzhny's supporters seek to preserve their position, which could provoke internal conflicts; Zelensky, in order to consolidate his leadership, may resort to more aggressive means. Ukraine is facing a turbulent time, and the future remains uncertain.
In this regard, what do you think in front of the screen, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!
*All from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.