Although the attention of the outside world to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has decreased significantly, this does not mean that the conflict is about to come to an end. For more than a year, the Ukrainian army has used more shells than expected, and the news has already spread. This is also confirmed by the state of aid from Western countries. In fact, one of NATO's original goals in promoting the Russia-Ukraine conflict was to deplete Russia's strength, and on the surface, this goal seems to have been achieved. However, NATO also paid a rather heavy price in the economic crisisThis is only a small part of the difficulties faced by NATO countries. Previously, NATO had threatened to "dismember" Russia, but as the front continues to lengthen, NATO's endurance is getting weaker and weaker, so how long can Ukraine last?As the Russia-Ukraine conflict enters the stage of a war of attrition, Ukraine's disadvantages will only become more and more significant. originally thought that with the arrival of cold air, the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield would enter a relatively calm state, but the facts tell us that the situation on the battlefield is ever-changing, often developing in unexpected directions.
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has been going on for more than a year now, and all parties are gradually losing interest in this conflict. The attention of the outside world has decreased significantly, and it no longer pays attention to every movement on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield as before. However, this does not mean that the conflict is coming to an end. The news that the Ukrainian army is using more artillery shells on the battlefield than expected has already been widely reported. The corresponding Western aid also validates the plight faced by the Ukrainian army. NATO's original vision was to achieve strategic goals by depleting Russia's strength. On the surface, this strategy does not seem to be too problematic, after all, Russia has paid a huge price and faced many challenges. However, NATO has also paid many, many costs, such as the economic crisisIssues such as the Kuk emergency have also become NATO's most worrying content. Even some Western countries have begun to call for the "dismemberment" of Russia, however, as the front of the battle is extended, NATO's dilemma is growing. So how long can Ukraine survive in this scenario?Just when the war was entering a state of recuperation in the cold air, Ukraine was once again waving the flames of war, which could not help but make people lament that the battlefield is always changing.
Recently, Ukraine and Russia seem to have changed their strategic tactics, from the original war of attrition to a war of retaliation. During Chinese New Year's Eve, Ukrainian forces aimed rocket artillery at the center of Donetsk, killing 4 people and wounding 13, according to **. There is also information that Ukraine **on social media** accused Russia of using a drone attackOdessa, resulting in the death of at least one person. In recent days, there has been a significant increase in attacks by both Russia and Ukraine, with some West** even calling it the most intensive missile attack since the beginning of the conflict. So why did the Russia-Ukraine conflict suddenly change from relatively calm before to radical today?It is argued that in this way the two sides are trying to break the deadlock and gain more initiative. However, this idea seems to apply only to Ukraine, because in these several retaliatory actions, the Ukrainian side has shown more initiative. There are many reasons why Ukraine had to take such actions. Western countries have long been exhausted, and the United States, Ukraine's strongest supporter, is unable to provide more aid. Therefore, Ukraine needs to achieve some results on the battlefield, prove to the West that Ukraine is worth and possibly even win the war. However, the situation in Russia is different. They have gradually come out of the most difficult times and have begun to try**. Plus the advantage of time is also on the side of Russia, therefore, Russia is in no hurry to make such an action.
Recently, the conflict between Ukraine and Russia has entered a new phase, transforming from a war of attrition to a war of revenge. Just during Chinese New Year's Eve, Ukrainian forces aimed rocket artillery at the center of Donetsk, killing 4 people and wounding 13. At the same time, Ukraine** accused Russia of using drone strikesOdessa, resulting in the death of at least one person. Recently, there has been a marked increase in attacks by Ukraine and Russia, and some Western** have even called this round of missile attacks the most intensive since the beginning of the conflict. So, what exactly is causing this to happen?It is argued that in this way the Ukrainian and Russian sides hope to break the deadlock and gain more initiative. However, this idea seems to apply only to the Ukrainian side, since in retaliatory actions, Ukraine showed stronger initiative. Ukraine had to take such an action, partly because Western countries were already in a difficult position to continue to provide more support, and on the other hand, in order to prove their worth and strive for victory. However, the situation in Russia is different, they have been graduallyGet out of the woodsBegin**. What's more, time is also on the side of Ukraine. Therefore, there is no need for Russia to rush into such actions.
It is worth notingMoscowThe people behind the instigation of the Ukrainian army's attack on the Russian mainland have been identified, and the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union have been warned that they will be held accountable for the large-scale attacks of the Ukrainian army on the Russian mainland. In other words,MoscowBehind the scenes** has been identified, and there are good reasons to point the finger at these countries. This may mean that spillovers are inevitable. (Palin).