These 3 types of authors have made editors unhappy for a long time! **There is a reason why it can't be sent! PS: "Edit" here is not a journal editor; "There is a reason why it can't be posted", it's a pure joke, the title party, don't exaggerate it too much!
do".Journal Recommendation Officer"After a long time, I have met all kinds of authors, and some authors really can't pull them out when they go to a dead end.
To summarize these 3 types, they really belong to the "incorrigible" type, and I hope to give you a warning.
Feel good about yourself
There are many such authors.
I only asked for the southern core, the quality of the article is absolutely high, and the duplicate check is 2%. You don't care if I'm in a high position or ...... other unit”
First of all, the unit is a threshold for the core. At the moment when journals pursue high citations, it is no secret that ** articles have requirements for units - everyone knows it, and they pretend not to be clear.
The North Nuclear Power Corporation generally requires the public to start with two books, and the Southern Nuclear Power requires undergraduate doctors or associate professors to start with it, and if individual articles are really of high quality, they can also be collected in small quantities. Actually, the author is not clear? Of course I know, otherwise I wouldn't have sent out an article for so long. But once the identity does not meet the requirements, and there is a need to develop the core, it begins to stick to it, and it has to be stubborn.
In fact, the core ** has long been not a choice of "one road to the black", the core book review, the first-level provincial party newspaper, and the network article have become the replacement material of the core**, as long as you have the intention to study the title document, why not send it? !
Secondly, is the quality of the article really high?
The doctor said that my ** core is no problem;
The master said that my article is of high quality, and I am a little aggrieved by the journal and want to publish a core; The teacher said that I have confidence in my essay and that the quality is okay.
* It's like your own child", who would say that their child is not good or bad, even if the child is bad, in the eyes of the parents, it is desirable. **Similarly, it's hard to find fault with your own articles.
It is recommended that before submitting the manuscript, you may wish to find an expert to help you go through it, one is to play a role in academic communication, and the other is that the shortcomings that you can't see are often found out by others, which helps us improve the quality of the article.
Obsessed with the "hire rate" type
Obsessed with the "acceptance rate" type = blind letter submission experience type.
I have said more than once that I don't believe too much in the experience of submission, and there are always people who don't listen to persuasion and ask, "I see that xxx says that master's solo works can also be posted, so can I also submit this article?" "xxx said that the acceptance rate is very high, and it is recommended to submit ......”
Things are man-made, and anyone (industry) involved must put a question mark, which is not necessarily true.
Behind the experience post, there may be a human message, the purpose of which is to guide the author to send the publication he wants the author to publish.
A contribution**, there will be comments from netizens at the bottom of each journal. Do you think these reviews were really written by the author?
Of course, it is not excluded that there will be authors who will take the initiative to leave a message, in order to give some help to future generations. However, it can be guaranteed that these well-meaning authors are definitely not more than 10%, with the psychology of the current people, it is a virtue not to show off and not to be outstanding, even if you really want to share your experience, you will definitely go to some well-known platforms that are more helpful to others.
Moreover, intermediary contributions**, it will definitely have a purpose for building its own website. According to the attributes of **, it must be to attract more authors, nominally it is a netizen comment, but in essence, it is to leave your information. So, the more comments there are, the more likely they are to retain you, and they tend to write some experience posts on their own.
In addition to this, the lag of the experience sticker is quite severe. **Publication is now a year, the review time is longer, the layout fee is getting more and more expensive, and the requirements are getting higher and higher.
**Behind the submission, the subjective and objective factors of people play a big role.
We often only see other people's submissions accepted, but ignore the efforts of the original author, whose article may have been polished for two or three years, and the submission is not successful and continues to be submitted, and finally can be included in a suitable journal;
The article is good because the author is willing to concentrate on research and learn scientific research writing. If it were you, would you be able to accept one or two rejections without getting discouraged? In other words, can you spend time and energy to sign up for academic training because you want to send the core, and learn the key points of writing from famous teachers?
We often only see other people's submissions accepted, but ignore the qualifications of the original author, who may be a doctoral lecturer in a public university;
The article can be recorded because the author's qualifications are not bad, a good unit can help the author get the ticket to the core, a good unit can provide more scientific research opportunities for the author, and a good unit can have better research resources and platforms. Do you have any of these?
So, don't ask "what's the hiring rate" anymore, it's useless!
No assertiveness, no hands-on type
The two biggest mysteries in the academic world in the past 23 years are the latest version of the catalog of the South and North Nuclear. Again, it is stated that both catalogs have been selected, but the final catalog has not yet been announced, and only a notice of inclusion has been issued.
Our company's view has always been that as long as it is not an official catalog, it is not a true catalog. When the official comes out to release the statement, it is the final version of the catalog.
The South Nuclear Directory is not so confusing, and before the two terms of the North Nuclear Corporation, a "List of Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences Discipline Citation Index ** Journals List" was issued by the "Overview of Chinese Core Journals", which was mistaken by many people as the core catalog of Peking University after the ** of the academic circle.
Actually, no, the classification is incomplete, the journals are incomplete, and the North Nuclear only makes a classification list, and there is never an excessive catalog of arts and sciences.
In addition, you can also know the latest progress in the development of the core catalog by checking the official website of Beitu. If you verify it yourself, you will never be deceived by others again.
In the second half of 23, a lot of effort was put into refuting rumors in the catalog, but there are still many people who still don't know the truth. It's really a rumor-mongering mouth, refuting rumors and breaking legs.