The class cadres received poverty subsidies and wore gold pixiu, and the low-income students were not selected
Goldfinger and the heroic class leader got the poverty subsidy, and the financially disadvantaged children were not selected, how should the tutor choose?
Now, getting into a college may seem easy, but people outside of it are often unaware of the complexities. Universities are considered to be the fairest and easiest places to get education.
But even in elementary and junior high school, student academic performance isn't the only answer. And, once you're in college, it's a big gamble. Honors, material awards, scholarships, as if it had become"Look in the mirror", shining in people's hearts.
Some of these problems are not new, they are just being exposed by the Internet. The conditions under which scholarships and special scholarships are awarded are often controversial in schools.
When I was studying, before the final exam, the teacher specifically warned me: don't plagiarize, don't let others plagiarize. You know, this will affect the results of subsequent exams, even if there is only a slight deviation, it may make others take away the rewards they deserve, and it will be too late to regret it by then.
The advisor's warning resonated with me. Scholarships, on the other hand, are easier and are based on the student's score and attendance. However, the Special Hardship Allowance is a bit more complicated.
Nowadays, most universities will have an admissions plan, which does not mean that you can apply as long as you have enough information, as long as you meet certain requirements. In addition to the quantitative limit, there are also differences in the level and amount of the scholarship.
In theory, in accordance with"Very difficult"，"More difficult"，"Medium difficulty"and other different categories divide different families. In practice, however, the question of how to decide which level of students to use and whether they should be funded or not is even more complicated.
A Changchun student exposed several issues on his blog. At the university he attended, the tutors reserved most of the funded positions for the class presidents, and those who had difficulties in life were not admitted.
The student said that although the deans of these schools did not seem to have any financial problems, in order to get special help, they still carried the mountain pike made of ** with them. It's a very mocking feeling, but there's nothing you can do about it.
The question of how counsellors decide and why scholarships are awarded to people who don't deserve them is even more puzzling. The students told the teacher their doubts, but the instructor told them that it was based on that"Overall performance"to decide. That is, when examining the family's economic situation, it is necessary to take into account factors such as the learning situation, the learning situation, the learning situation, and the learning situation. However, this argument obviously does not satisfy these students.
Why are some children from poor families, average grades, and few failed courses not admitted, but have become the biggest beneficiaries? That's too obvious, right? This leads people to think how ridiculous the ** subsidy program is that "looks good on the outside, but is actually a mess".
In the comment area, many students said that such things happened in their classes. called"Poor students"people are not really poor, they have ** and cosmetics are higher than other students, and their clothes and shoes are also higher than other students.
For them, this money is not to ease their living burden, but more like a gift to them"Small gifts"。Many students felt unhappy about this and questioned the selection method of the tutor, why can't they lend a helping hand to those students who have problems?
People ask if this question is not very common in universities. Actually, this is not a common phenomenon. The reason for this is mainly due to the differences in the teaching methods of the teachers and the school atmosphere. This phenomenon exists even in institutions of higher learning, and even in some prestigious universities.
Some advisors may find it plausible for several reasons: In adult society, not everything can be accepted"Sanity"The word says it all. In the teacher's view, there are many aspects to consider when receiving a scholarship, not just a family situation. It should also be incorporated into classroom teaching and personal contact with tutors.
Teachers can decide whether or not they can get funding from the school based on the student's actual situation. If a child is unwilling to devote his energy and cooperate with the teacher just because of poor family conditions, he will not have a strong sense of self-motivation. On the other hand, teachers should also actively intervene in everything in their daily work, and devote more time and energy to assisting teachers in handling management work and various activities in the school. Teachers may feel biased in their choices.
In general, interpersonal relationships in schools are far more complex than in schools and secondary schools, not because of the relationships between students"Friendlier", but the stakes are much higher. Scholarships and grants are real money, and they can also better bring out the conflicts of students. This selection method and guidelines are also a manifestation of fairness to teachers and schools. In order to be recognized in this case, it needs to be followed"Rules"。If it is found that a teacher is seeking benefits from it, the relevant competent authority is requested to stop it.
Topic: How do you evaluate it?