The EU is dancing frantically at the "tip of the knife", repeatedly provoking Russia, trying to test Russia's bottom line, where is it. As a result, the Russian side has recently directly put down some cruel words, if the EU dares to move, it will be to provoke a war!
I'll talk to you about it. Since the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the EU has not been idle, in addition to sanctioning Russia and providing assistance to Ukraine together with the United States, it has also frozen hundreds of billions of euros of Russian assets.
Now that the EU is a little stretched, it has become interested in the seized Russian assets. Russia has obviously noticed this dangerous trend and directly warned the EU not to think crookedly.
The EU wants to use the money to invest in Ukraine's post-war reconstruction. This is obviously unacceptable to Russia, when and when will it be the turn of outsiders to decide how to use Russian assets?
What's more, on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield, it is no one else who has the initiative now, it is Russia. Although the United States and the European Union said that they have vigorously assisted Ukraine and made the Ukrainian army **, however, the decline of the Ukrainian army on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield cannot be reversed in a while. And Ukraine is not only facing the pressure of the battlefield, but also extremely tense internally.
Presumably everyone knows that Ukraine's ** Zelensky wants to replace the commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army, Zaluzhny. The situation that Ukraine is facing now is simply to survive in the cracks.
Now, the EU wants to use Russian funds to discuss the so-called post-war reconstruction of Ukraine, which is obviously out of place. What we should think more about is how the conflict between Russia and Ukraine should end. Ukraine, supported by the United States and Europe, is now also "mud can't support the wall".
Russia is not in a hurry at all, what threat does the EU have to Russia now? Originally, there were still energy exchanges with Russia, which was somewhat fettered, but the European Union followed the United States, and after sanctioning Russia, Russia has found a new energy market, and European countries can threaten Russia's energy exports? In the end, it is the European people who are unlucky, who cannot enjoy high-quality, stable energy, and will be harvested by the Americans.
In my opinion, now the EU can clearly see the tragic situation of European countries, so it wants to take risks and use Russian funds to solve the urgent need. But think about it from another angle, what happens if you provoke Russia to anger? Even if the Russian-Ukrainian war stops, will European countries still have the opportunity to enjoy Russia's convenient and stable energy? I'm afraid that I can only look at the United States to buy oil from Russia and sell it to Europeans.
Therefore, the EU, which has no good fruit to eat when it has a hard fight with Russia, and the EU, which does not dare to offend even a single Houthi, dares to really "tear its face" with Russia?
Obviously, now the European Union, in order to ensure economic development and maintain stability, the United States can also be left aside. Although the Americans want to put pressure on the EU and Russia to work against each other and consume Russia's energy, it is a question of whether the EU dares or not.
Just like in the Red Sea, in order to maintain normality, the EU deliberately intends to send its own escort force to escort merchant ships, but it is clearly stated that the escort ships are not under the command of the Americans. To put it bluntly, the Europeans are now unable to participate in other wars, and only want to recover their economies as quickly as possible.
If at this time, it is true that it will anger Russia and fight a ** war, which is contrary to the strategic layout of Europe wanting independence, and the people in the EU should know this better than anyone else.