It's a lot of uproar! Experts advised young people not to go back to the countryside to build houses, which sparked heated discussions
Opposition to the proposal to return to the hometown to build a house: expert opinion sparks controversy.
At the time of the outbreak of the disease, the opinion of experts was quite controversial. Some are skeptical of the opinions of these experts or simply ignore them. Not long ago, Lu Ming, a professor at Shanghai Jiaotong University, gave advice to young people, causing widespread concern. He said that if young people don't want to return to their hometowns to farm, they should not return to their hometowns to build houses. He believes that in third- and fourth-tier cities, he can buy a house for tens of thousands of yuan. This statement touches on the traditional idea that for a long time, they want to return to their hometown to live in their nest and complete their own"Fallen leaves return to their roots"Wish.
Lu Ming's remarks caused a heated discussion on the Internet. Some agree with him that building houses in the countryside will result in idle and wasted land. They noticed that because the number of people in the village was decreasing, if a house was built in the village and could not last long, the house would become an ownerless asset. Also, building a house in the countryside doesn't make sense if you plan to live in the city and then go back to the country decades later. It is said that it costs 20-300,000 yuan to build a house in the countryside, and in some places it can even reach 60-700,000 yuan. Such a ** can buy a house in the city, so it is not a good thing to build a house in the countryside.
But there are also many netizens who are skeptical. Some people say that having a house in the countryside is a good thing, and this statement is irrefutable. In fact, urban housing has long been redundant, and now there are 4.3 billion housing stocks in the country, with an average of 3 households per person. In addition, some people see country houses as "homes" and town houses as "goods". They highlighted the benefits of a country home, such as no parking fees, no property tax, and the ability to grow fresh vegetables. Country houses are also valued due to 70 years of ownership, compared to 70 years of ownership in towns.
In addition, some people also stressed the need to protect the houses in their hometowns. They believe that no matter what the current economic situation is, having a home in their hometown is the most important thing. Even if your family is not in a good situation, you can provide a safe place for your children. They say, "Wealth cannot exceed three generations, and poverty cannot exceed three generations," so it is impossible for us to determine the wealth and financial situation of our descendants. Therefore, building a house can not only make people feel at ease, but also allow future generations to have a stable life.
In short, there are different opinions on whether to build a house in the countryside. Although life in the city can bring us good education, health and work, the countryside is still our roots, our home. So, whether rich or poor, they should not abandon their houses in the countryside, because that is their roots. I think it's better to buy a house in the city if the economy allows. However, old houses in the countryside should also be preserved, as a way to return to their homeland and to leave a warm and stable home for the next generation. A house is not only an object, but also a responsibility to our family and our legacy. In this regard, we must weigh its advantages and disadvantages and make a rational decision accordingly. Please leave a comment, let's **, and exchange ideas together. Thank you for your appreciation, and I hope this article will inspire you.