Recently, the British "well-known" and "authoritative" BBC has once again engaged in the old business of creating fake news, showing the true colors of the British ** against China as "low-level black", "deliberately black" and "brainless black".
Maybe the BBC knows that as long as the topic of China is brought in, no matter how fake the news is, it can always bring a wave of traffic.
No, since the "Measures for the Supervision and Administration of Budgetary Investment Projects" deliberated and approved by China on February 1 came into effect, the UK has been in full swing to start the rumor-mongering mode.
This new regulation aims to strengthen the supervision and management of investment projects within the budget, standardize the implementation of projects and the use of funds, and protect and improve the comprehensive benefits of investment within the budget, which means to supervise how the country's money is spent and increase the transparency of the use of the budget, which is definitely a good policy for the benefit of the country and the people.
However, the BBC bigwigs do not think so, they not only misinterpret the purpose of the policy, but also continue to demonize China's image, portraying China as a "surveillance power", constantly monitoring the words and deeds of ordinary people, and claiming out of context that China will use drones and satellite remote sensing to monitor some large-scale projects in the country, sending to the world that China is like a big prison, where people have no freedom, let alone democracy.
However, the eyes of the people of the world are not blind, this is obviously the "low-level black" of the United Kingdom, and many people have expressed their opinions after reading the report: What's the matter? China's regulatory ** budget is not good, so it's good that you Britain and the United States cover up the whereabouts of the funds, conceal the use of the funds, and take taxpayers' money to do nonsense?
Foreign readers do not buy it, and experts and scholars are not vegetarians, they generally believe that China's new regulations are not as reported by **, on the contrary, the implementation of the new regulations can inject new impetus into China's development.
The mass boycott of netizens has blinded the BBC in this rumor-mongering.
The BBC, as the most influential in the world, has always claimed to be impartial and independent, but it has spared no effort in smearing and slandering China.
As early as the promulgation and implementation of the ** law, the BBC claimed that the law led to "the possibility of arrest of anyone who criticizes Hong Kong" and that "the national security law will be forced to undermine democracy in Hong Kong".
During the epidemic, it demonized China's epidemic prevention policy, belittled China's outstanding contribution to containing the epidemic, and constantly told the people of the world**: China's efforts are useless, and other countries are doing better.
Judging from the dirty behavior of the BBC family, it can be seen that the UK** attacks and smears against China.
The United Kingdom, represented by the BBC, is actually a propaganda machine used by the United Kingdom to smear other countries, especially China.
Recently, a joint study by the Lau Institute for China Studies at King's College London and the Chinese University of Hong Kong found that from 2020 to 2023, more than 1,000 reports published by the British mainstream**, including the BBC, The Guardian, the Financial Times, and the Daily Telegraph, have "almost zero positive reports", and these negative news mainly involve political issues, while China-related news occupies a large share.
In fact, since the 50s of the last century, Britain has begun a special operation to smear China, and the code name of this operation is called "black propaganda", you must know that at that time New China had just been established.
The most famous thing is that Britain used "black propaganda", and with the participation of the CIA, the leader of the Communist Party of India, Sukarno, was smeared as Hitler, creating the "Indonesian big **", which led to the killing of a large number of Chinese.
And today, the "black propaganda" continues.
For example, in the propaganda war of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, some British people with ulterior motives pointed the finger at China and smeared China by taking advantage of the heat of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
For another example, in 2022, the British "Independent", which advertises itself as a "Hong Kong expert", wrote "Seoul" as "Hong Kong" when reporting on the Halloween celebration in Itaewon, Seoul, South Korea, and even the ** lead of Twitter emphasized that the place of the incident was "Hong Kong", which caused netizens to ridicule: "The Independent" is brain dead. Sure enough, the British ** took the "brainless black" to the extreme.
The UK has been getting up in the midst of continuous overturning, which can be described as "the more frustrated the braver". In June 2021, the well-known British "Economist" published an article related to Tibet, claiming that the Sichuan-Tibet Railway, which had just opened, "cost the people and money" and "destroyed the traditional culture of Tibetan areas". However, unexpectedly, the comment area of this article overturned again, and foreign netizens asked rhetorically: Isn't this a good thing? Isn't this "deliberately hacking"?
"Black propaganda" is black after all, and Britain stupidly thinks that black can block the eyes of the people, but the eyes of the masses of the world are bright and their heads are sober.
British blogger Ben Coleman shared his feelings about living in China on social media and countered the prejudice of the West against China. "Don't look at the West, they are poisonous. They only say what they want to say, and smearing China is in line with their narrative," Coleman said, "and in fact, China is safe, but people don't want to believe it." ”
So, why does Britain know that the lie will be exposed, but it still doesn't want its old face and shamelessly spreads rumors about China?
On the one hand, the rise of China has caused countries such as the United Kingdom to suffer from "Sinophobia", they regard China's development as a huge threat and challenge to their own country, so they try to smear China's image in the world and weaken China's influence through fake news, so as to achieve the goal of containing China's development.
On the other hand, how can there be no United States in the fight against China?
European scholar Jan O'Berry once broke the news that the United States will spend 1.5 billion US dollars (about 10.7 billion yuan) in five years to improve the level of Western journalists to smear China, mainly to train American and Western journalists to write negative reports related to China.
This expenditure is even enshrined in the United States. In 2021, the United States issued a strategic competition bill, which mentioned that the United States would invest $300 million in each fiscal year from 2022 to 2026 to crack down on "China's global influence", and even bluntly mentioned that the money would be allocated to "independent**" and so-called "third-party" civil society groups for anti-China reporting and spreading negative news about the "Belt and Road" initiative.
In 2023, Spanish journalist Javier Garcia said that he would be pressured by ** every day to force him and his colleagues to negatively promote the image of China.
Money can make ghosts grind, and the United States has spent a lot of money to induce traditional allies led by the United Kingdom to manipulate China-related countries, let them act as the mouthpiece of China, and nakedly turn the media with the purpose of justice and truth into a political tool to suppress and contain China.
Such a bad act of the West, represented by the United States and Britain, has already brought serious harm.
Tim Hart, assistant professor at the Centre for China Studies at the University of Hong Kong Chinese and former British Consul General in Chongqing, pointed out that "the UK's focus on political, economic, social and cultural issues is uneven, leaving readers unable to understand the comprehensive, three-dimensional and real China. ”
In addition to misleading the world's perception of China, these false reports may also lead to a sharp increase in violent crimes against Chinese and Asian Americans in some countries and regions, and the adverse effects will backfire on the initiators led by Britain and the United States!
Under the leadership and support of the United States, these self-proclaimed "free, objective, professional, and truthful" Britain**, chasing after the wind, spreading rumors, slandering China, losing the professional ethics of journalism, and ignoring their own reputation, will inevitably encounter a serious credibility crisis.
I advise these unscrupulous people, abide by professional ethics, leave their prejudiced eyes away from China, and pay more attention to the chaotic public health services in the UK, the "high fever" inflation, the hollowing out of the industrial system, the growing gap between the rich and the poor, and the scandalous political situation, so as to truly achieve the best for the people and benefit the people.