With the continuous advancement of urbanization, urban demolition has become a common problem. As an important way of resolution, reasonable compensation has always been one of the points of contention. This article will analyze the reasonableness and unreasonableness of compensation in urban demolition and relocation, and discuss what needs to be done by the demolition party to ensure reasonable compensation.
1. Reasonableness of compensation.
Reasonable compensation should be reflected in three aspects.
1.Land**.
In urban demolition, the demolition party needs to pay compensation for the land**. Reasonable compensation should be reflected in the land paid by the demolition party**. When paying for the land, factors such as the actual value of the land, the market, and the compensation standard set by the land should be taken into account to ensure that the compensation costs are fair, reasonable and sufficient.
2.House**.
In addition to the land**, the demolition party also needs to pay the value of the house of the person being demolished. This ** should be determined according to the situation of the house, location, market value and other factors to ensure that the rights and interests of the demolished are protected.
3.Cost of living.
After the demolition, many relocated households may need to change their lifestyle or relocate to other places, and they need to pay the corresponding living expenses. This should also be included in the scope of compensation. Similarly, other personal injuries and property damage that may occur as a result of demolition and relocation should also be reasonably compensated.
To sum up, reasonable compensation should take into account the land**, house** and living expenses, etc., so as to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the demolished people.
2. The unreasonableness of the compensation.
In urban demolition, the unreasonableness of compensation is mainly manifested in the following aspects:
1.Some demolition parties mishandled it.
Some demolition parties are superficial and do not really think about the people to be demolished, not only paying compensation fees that are lower than the actual amount, but even defaulting on compensation fees, which seriously harms the legitimate rights and interests of the people being demolished.
2.The compensation standard is unreasonable.
On the other hand, some departments may set excessively high or too low compensation standards, resulting in unfair compensation costs. Some ultra-high standards of compensation may also lead to excessive speculation by other residents about housing prices in these areas, and then become a bubble at some moments.
3. The demolition party should do these tasks.
1.Respect the legitimate rights and interests of the people being demolished.
* The department and the demolition party need to always respect the legitimate rights and interests of the demolished person on the premise of ensuring that the interests of the demolished person are not harmed.
2.Transparent compensation standards.
* The department should formulate a transparent and open compensation standard and announce it to the public, so that the person being demolished and other relevant parties can understand the fairness and reasonableness of the compensation standard.
3.Strict implementation of compensation procedures.
* The department and the demolition party should strictly implement the compensation procedures, follow the compensation standards and procedures, and ensure that the demolished people can receive the compensation they deserve.
4.Differentiated compensation methods.
*The department and the demolition party should take into account the differences in the living and economic conditions of the people being demolished, and formulate differentiated compensation methods to meet the needs of the people being demolished as much as possible.
5.Establish a litigation mechanism.
* The department needs to establish a sound litigation mechanism so that the people who are being demolished can protect their rights and interests through legal means.
To sum up, the issue of reasonable compensation in urban demolition requires the cooperation of the first department and the demolition party, respecting the legitimate rights and interests of the demolished people, open and transparent compensation standards, strictly implementing compensation procedures, formulating differentiated compensation methods, and establishing a sound litigation mechanism to ensure that the rights and interests of the demolished people are effectively protected.