The secret in the mobile phone is the betrayal and breakdown of a marriage!
In that quiet town in Mianyang, Sichuan, Ms. Li and Mr. Tang were once a model couple that everyone envied, and together they raised a smart and clever daughter, Xiao Tang. However, 14-year-old Xiao Tang's unintentional move, like a sharp pair of scissors, instantly cut through the harmony and happiness on the surface of this family. When the daughter played with her father's mobile phone, the piercing recordings sounded like thunder - it was about 200,000 cash, the so-called 'sensible junior' and the unbearable inside story of emotional entanglement. How exactly did this storm evolve? The husband ran away from home, and the wife sued angrily, what kind of truth is hidden in the mysterious transfer of 250,000 yuan? It seems like it's just ...... begun
It is said that that night, when Xiao Tang was playing with his father, Mr. Tang's mobile phone, he accidentally found a series of heart-wrenching call recordings. In the recording, "I spent 200,000 yuan to raise you for half a year", "I'm afraid I haven't met such a sensible 'little three'?" Those ambiguous words were like a thunderbolt from the sky, making this 14-year-old girl overwhelmed.
Shocked, she backed up the recording with a calmness beyond her age and handed it over to her mother, Ms. Li. When Ms. Li heard this, it was like a bolt from the blue, and she was furious and followed the clues to check the accounts, and was shocked to find that Mr. Tang had transferred a huge amount of 250,000 yuan to a person named Ms. Wang.
As a result, Ms. Li had a fierce quarrel with her husband out of anger, which led to the breakdown of the relationship between the husband and wife, and Mr. Tang decided to run away from home and claimed to divorce. After Ms. Li communicated several times and could not get a reply, she took Ms. Wang to court and listed her husband, Mr. Tang, as a third person, demanding more than 250,000 yuan.
The trial scene was as gripping as a movie, Mr. Tang faced a question and argued that it was just a normal interaction between card players, while Ms. Wang was even more flickering, arguing that she and Mr. Tang did not have an improper relationship between men and women, and the two were card friends. There was no huge amount of 250,000 yuan at all, and there was no so-called third party involved, Mr. Tang transferred only more than 210,000 yuan to him, and he transferred more than 90,000 yuan to Mr. Tang, which was all the project money that Mr. Tang exchanged from himself for the project, which belonged to normal financial business transactions. As for the other payments, they are just funds between players, winning or losing, winning or losing.
At the same time, Mr. Tang also echoed that he and Ms. Wang were just ordinary friends, and that the money was cash exchanged for daily consumption and playing cards, and also claimed that he and his wife, Ms. Li, had been arguing all year long, and that his expenses were all borrowed money. The family conflict between Mr. Tang and Ms. Li escalated into a court showdown, and the once loving couple now turned against each other, and the case involving ethical and property disputes became more and more compelling.
The heated discussions on the Internet are pouring in like a tide, and the comments of netizens are varied, some people say that if the marriage is cheated, this man should leave the house.
Some netizens still admired that this man asked his wife to get the money back for the mistress, and then when he divorced, he had to divide half of the money with his wife, one word "absolutely!" ”
Some people feel worthless for Ms. Wang, and other wives have the right to recover the money from her husband's cheating.
Some netizens lamented that once the trust in marriage is broken, the puzzle of money and love is chilling. Mr. Tang's actions not only hurt his family, but also challenged the bottom line of social morality.
Mr. Tang has always shown himself as a good man in the circle of friends, and this reversal undoubtedly surprised the relatives and friends around him. In the past, Ms. Li also chose to let go of financial management because of her trust in the family business, but unexpectedly gave Mr. Tang the opportunity to abuse the funds. And Ms. Wang, who was brought to court, although she tried her best to clear up the relationship, her past life experience was also picked up by netizens Many intriguing stories, which sparked in-depth public discussions about the "third party" behavior and its legal consequences.
Through the audio recordings and other evidence provided by Ms. Li, the court found that behind those seemingly ordinary transfers were actually financial transfers made by Mr. Tang in order to maintain his extramarital relationship with Ms. Wang.
There was also an interesting scene during the trial, under the pressure of losing the lawsuit, Mr. Tang and Ms. Wang unanimously demanded that only half of the funds be returned, and the reason given was that Mr. Tang and his wife were about to divorce, and the 250,000 yuan property would be divided at that time. As soon as the news came out, there was an uproar, and the public questioned whether this ridiculous proposal could be supported by law.
From a legal point of view, Mr. Tang's unauthorized disposal of the joint property of the husband and wife clearly violated the basic principles of the Marriage Law. The gift he made was based on an improper extramarital affair, which seriously violated Ms. Li's property rights and interests as a spouse and social public morality. In addition, for Ms. Wang, even if she did not know the marital status of the other party when she accepted the gift, but still refused to return the full amount after learning about it, she was also subject to both moral and legal scrutiny.
In response to this case, I believe that fidelity and respect in marriage are not only moral constraints, but should also be reflected in practical life. Mr. Tang's infidelity and the act of giving others a huge amount of property without permission have already constituted a violation of the spirit of the marriage contract. Regardless of the subsequent verdict, this case is a reminder that there is a need to build trust between husband and wife, and that neither party has the right to dispose of joint property at will. At the same time, it has also triggered the first case of similar cases, such as another high-profile "Luo Yixiao incident", which also involves the protection of the joint property of husband and wife, which further proves the importance of strictly following legal norms.
Marriage is not only a matter for two people, but also involves the maintenance of women's education, family stability and even social order. After the incident fermented, everyone began to think more about the balance between fairness and responsibility, property management and rights and interests protection in marriage. So how do we protect that initial commitment in modern marriage and avoid a similar tragedy? And when there is a crack in the family, how can the law provide strong protection for the injured party? These are questions that deserve everyone's deep thought.