The Israeli forces launched a military operation in the Gaza Strip at night that was unlike any previous land operation, it did not conduct large-scale operations, it did not conduct any reconnaissance, it was more like a military exercise, a kind of large-scale combat exercise. What's going on? How many times have there been criticisms, both nationally and internationally? What's the use?
This time, Israel mobilized various forces and divided them into three routes: one was to penetrate deep into Gaza and engage in fierce fire against Hamas militants. However, Israel has not wanted to rely on numbers to win, they also have two teams, one is an armored force, which includes both armored infantry and armored fighting vehicles, these infantry can come and go freely in the streets of Gaza, completely suppressing Hamas's AK47, M16 and other light weapons.
The other is the mechanized corps, which carries excavators and other equipment that can penetrate walls, and is specially designed for the complex terrain of Gaza, where there are many houses and underground passages, where Hamas militants can lurk and cause headaches for the Israeli military. Therefore, the Israeli army made use of this weapon and smashed through the wall and penetrated inside, avoiding confrontation with the enemy. This is also the characteristic of the Israeli Army's operation.
In addition to the Hamas-made Kasan missile, Israel also has an air force, including drones and combat helicopters, which can provide air strikes and support in air strikes on Gaza. Israel has such force, what else does Hamas have? The most important thing about Hamas is that it has a lot of rocket launchers that can be used to attack Israeli towns and troops. Their rocket artillery is not useless, as long as you give the Israelis a shell, you can still bring a little damage to the other side. In the Middle East, a counter-terrorism force made up of Lebanese Allah forces destroyed a tank with a rocket launcher. What is the purpose of Israel's large-scale destruction of Gaza before its attack on Gaza?
One way is to fragment them by disrupting the links between the various parts of Hamas so that they become uncohesive. Another reason is to control public opinion, without the Internet, there is no news, Israel is not public, the situation in Gaza, how many people have been killed or injured, will not be known, this is also a way for Israel to deal with the world. However, in Israel's on-the-ground military exercises, it has met with strong opposition from people abroad.
This is an 85-year-old Israeli Yucheved Livshz, who was rescued from Israel by Hamas. The poll, conducted by the Times of Israel, showed that 49 percent of the population was opposed to military activities on land, compared with only 29 percent of the population. Why are there so many naysayers? Hamas also holds more than 220 Israeli hostages. They believe that the hostages should be released before Hamas can be dealt with. With regard to the hostages, Qatar is holding consultations and the two sides are debating how to free the hostages and what benefits Hamas will receive, and significant progress is said to have been made in that regard.
I think the first people to be freed were people with dual citizenship, followed by Israelis. Since many of the abductees were dual nationals and Israel was not in favour of fighting on the ground, there was also a rare international consensus. I'm talking about the General Assembly, which adopted a bill on Gaza calling for an immediate ceasefire between the two sides and the opening of humanitarian pathways. And in the meantime, the European Union has reached a consensus in a few days, and its fundamental point of view has not changed, which is to stop the accusations against Hamas and Israel and stop the fighting in the first place. Turning on humanitarian transport, bringing more supplies to Gaza, saving more people from starvation, is the situation in Gaza today.
Michael Michel, president of the European Council, said in an interview with reporters in Brussels that the two camps of Palestine and Israel are engaged in a "big war" in the true sense of the word, and the "** war" from various countries, including Israel itself, are arguing over this issue. However, in the debate of all this, the only thing that has come to common is that the United States is on the same camp as Israel. The United States and Israel voted down the bill adopted by the General Assembly. What's more, even the European Union, represented by the European Union, only has a common idea on some issues, that is, whether there can be a temporary truce, whether it can give priority to the distribution of supplies, and whether it can alleviate the humanitarian catastrophe of mankind, these are the most likely consensus in the world at present.