Recently, a female anchor publicly criticized experts and professors, saying that 70% of experts on the Internet are rice buckets. She believes that these experts have no personal experience, but only talk on paper and do not understand the actual situation. The female anchor's remarks sparked heated discussions and controversies among netizens, what is the reason for this?
The female anchor is an expert in the field of finance and taxation, and her remarks shocked many viewers and netizens. She pointed out that those who claim to be experts are free to express their opinions without actual experience, which creates a lot of skepticism and disgust. Female anchors think that these experts are not so much giving advice as they are talking. Through her point of view, netizens began to reflect on the real ability and professionalism of the experts and professors.
However, netizens are not consistent in their attitudes towards the female anchor's remarks. Some netizens think that what the female anchor said has a certain truth, because there are indeed some experts' suggestions that are outrageous and do not understand the real situation of ordinary people. Another part of netizens said that the female anchor's remarks were too general and could not fully represent all experts. In this controversy, we need to think further about the true value of experts and professors, and how their advice should be treated correctly.
As we all know, experts and professors should have the knowledge and experience to provide professional and accurate advice to the public. However, in recent years, the suggestions of some experts have frequently aroused public doubts and controversy. These outrageous suggestions are not only ridiculous, but also cast doubt on the experts' knowledge and understanding of real-world issues.
A TsinghuaUniversityIn response to a question about solving the difficulties of low-income groups, the professor made some bizarre suggestions. He believes that low-income groups only need to earn more money, such as using their property, such as renting out idle houses, soliciting customers, etc., to increase their income. Such a proposal is not only lacking in practical feasibility, but also lacking in correctnessSocialThe bottom crowdlifeA true understanding of the situation. Such advice is more like a mockery that calls into question the IQ of experts.
In addition, the statements of some experts are also surprising. One expert said that the average household assets of Chinese should be at least 3 million, and even think that it is normal for families to have spare money. However, this statement is contrary to that of most ordinary peoplelifeThere is a serious disconnect in reality. For ordinary people, being able to save hundreds of thousands or millions of family assets is already a great luxury. These outrageous statements cast doubt on whether experts really know ordinary peoplelifeStatus quo andSocialActual situation.
In addition to advice on low-income groups and family assets, some experts also advise young people on buying homes,Farmersand working hours. These statements are not only far from reality, but also raise questions about whether the experts really understand the nature of the problem and the actual situation.
In the face of the outrageous advice of experts and professors, more and more netizens expressed disappointment and anger. They believe that these experts do not understand the real situation and needs of ordinary people, and only talk about theories and high-mindedness. This feeling gives people a feeling of being ignored and misled, and it also leads to some netizensRebellious mentality
On the one hand, the suggestions of experts and professors have made some netizens impatient and questioning. They believe that these suggestions are far from the actual situation, completely inconsistent with real needs, and even make people feel that they are teasing ordinary people. This disappointment and skepticism has led to a significant decline in trust in the experts and professors.
On the other hand, some netizens have expert suggestionsRebellious mentality。In the face of frequent outrageous suggestions, some netizens are reluctant to listen to the opinions of experts, and even have doubts about the opinions of all experts. They believe that the expert professors have lost their trust and support, and whatever the experts say, they feel is wrong.
In short, the outrageous advice of the expert professor disappointed and angered some netizens, and at the same time produced aRebellious mentality。In this case, we should look at the suggestions of experts and professors with an objective attitude, and we should not deny the value of all experts because of a few outrageous suggestions. At the same time, experts and professors should also pay more attentionSocialvoice, closer to the needs of ordinary people, give more practical and feasible suggestions.