During the Spring Festival, which one has the most tap water**? There is no doubt that it is Article 20!
Many viewers chose not to go two days before the Spring Festival because they were worried that the movie was too serious. However, as the film garnered plenty of critical acclaim in the circle of friends, its wheel of fortune began to spin.
The praise of the general public is better than the gold and silver cups, and the gold and silver awards are not as good as their praise. This sentence is like spring rain moisturizing things and nourishing people's hearts. This sentence could not be more suitable for the "Article 20" of "asking for the life of the heavens and avenging the grievances of the weak".
We can use the most real data to prove that the box office of the third year of junior high school exceeds that of the second year of junior high school, and the fourth day of junior high school exceeds that of junior high school, which is the only movie in the Spring Festival schedule that has a sharp decline in the box office for two consecutive days!
In the tap water**, there are people who work in law.
In addition, there are also the thoughts of the "top class of law popularization" teacher Luo Xiang after **!
The most popular is still the general audience, and some people take the initiative to recommend wanting to bring their families along**.
Some people think that taking children to the movies is a success!
And those that suggest people brush again!
Considering there is so much tap water now**, I don't want to have another one either. Today, I want to go deep into this movie, and combine it with Mr. Luo Xiang's in-depth analysis and the sharp comments of netizens, hoping that those who read my article will have a strong interest in this movie.
This film mainly starts from the perspective of Han Ming (played by Lei Jiayin), a temporary prosecutor, and shows the audience three cases related to him.
Because Han Yuchen witnessed the bullying of his classmates, he did not hesitate to break the bridge of the abuser's nose, but was called to the police by the other party's parents and faced the risk of possible detention;
In order to protect the harassed female passenger, the company's driver, Zhang Guisheng, injured her during the pestering process, so it was determined that he intentionally harmed;
The most difficult problem has not yet been solved, Wang Yongqiang of the village was bullied by the village bully because of loan sharking, and in order to protect his wife and daughter, he did not hesitate to stab the bully with scissors.
These three cases have made Han Ming's daily life chaotic, but they all point to a very tangible social issue – how to define legitimate defense.
I believe that many viewers are not unfamiliar with these kinds of cases, and are even very familiar with them. For example, the prototype stories in this film, "Yu Huan's Mother Murder Case" and "Yu Haiming's Anti-Murder Case", they were originally victims, but in the process of fighting, due to the harm caused to the other party, the roles were reversed and became defendants.
Why is this happening? Is this an appropriate practice? Who will bring justice to them?
Based on the clues in the film, Mr. Luo Xiang explained how "legitimate defense" should be defined in law.
He pointed out that there are two core standards for what is commonly referred to as "legitimate defense": first, the standard of ordinary people who are true and vivid based on the position of the defender; The second criterion of justifiable defense is the standard of a calm and rational person who is high above. The second is the standard of a condescending, calm and composed rational person.
In addition, the act of "justifiable self-defense" must have occurred while the unlawful offense was taking place.
However, there are no clear guidelines for this so-called "ongoing process".
In the movie, especially Liu Wenjing, the village tyrant, lasted for half a year. Even after the case, this kind of ** has not been alleviated, Wang Yongqiang's home has been maliciously slandered, and the mute mother and daughter left behind have been chased and intercepted from all sides, this is really an unbelievable thing?
On the basis of the above, Mr. Luo Xiang pointed out that legitimate defense should be based on the specific situation faced by the defender in the process of defense, and at the same time combine moral and utilitarian perspectives to provide vivid and real judgments, rather than indifferently starting from God's point of view, thereby hurting the feelings of ordinary people.
In fact, whether it is through the movie or Mr. Luo Xiang's explanation, its core purpose is to convey a message, that is, how to use Article 20 to protect good people and punish ** people.
In this movie, we can feel the deep despair of ordinary people when they suffer from **.
There are two scenes in the film that impressed me, the first is that Zhang Guisheng, a bus driver, wants a fair explanation when faced with an unfair verdict, but his heart is full of worry and bitterness;
Secondly, Wang Yongqiang's wife, Hao Xiuping, as a witness, has been trying to clear her husband's name, but in the end she was driven to the brink of collapse by the village bullies.
In Article 20, the pain experienced by those victims touched my heart deeply, and I was deeply moved by the sincerity of those victims.
Imagine that without these illegal violations, Han Ming and his family would still live happily ever after, and Zhang Guisheng, as the bus pacesetter, and Wang Yongqiang and Hao Xiuping, the couple, would strive for a better future.
Those who break the law destroy their happy lives, and only severe punishment can serve as a warning.
As mentioned in the film, "the law should not be compromised by illegal acts".
* After this film, I believe everyone realized that the law is not as profound and complex as the public thinks, it reflects more of the daily emotions and feelings of ordinary people, and also more reflects the basic pursuit of fairness and justice for ordinary people.
Finally, it is worth mentioning that after director Zhang Yimou successfully mastered the grand theme of "law and love", he also injected a lot of vitality and humor into the film, so that the whole work can still maintain a relaxed and humorous atmosphere under the serious theme.
I hope that everyone will think deeply about the current reality in a joyful environment.
On the whole, "Article 20" is a very attractive, informative film, and its ending brings a very pleasant viewing experience to the audience, which is definitely worth repeating**!