NBA player contract amounts continue to climb, and some players' super-cap contracts have sparked controversy.
For example, last summer's offseason, the Celtics agreed to a five-year deal with Jaylen Brown for a three$0.4 billion super maximum salary contract, this figure directly set the record for the largest contract in NBA history, ranking first in the league.
While Brown has the strength of an All-Star, the contract is just too big. In comparison, Jokic, the current and No. 1 combat player, has only signed for 5 years700 million contracts. This has sparked a debate about whether a player's contract is justified.
Some of the younger stars, such as Haliburton, Edwards and three-ball Ball, signed with the Pacers, Timberwolves and Hornets for five years and as many as 2$600 million super cap contract.
While Haliburton and Edwards have performed well to lead the team to a rise, Ball's contract does offer a premium compared to them. For example, LaVine of the Bulls, his 5 years 2The 1.5 billion contract is a representative of the premium.
The Celtics made two major reinforcement deals last offseason, with management packing up key rotations for Porzingis and Holiday to form the league's top starting five.
So far this season, the Celtics have indeed lived up to expectations, ranking at the top of the league in many statistics and ranking first in the league. If they do win the championship, it will be worth it to re-sign Brown with a maximum salary and pay a big price for Porzingis and Holiday in exchange.
Overall, whether the player's contract amount is reasonable, and the impact on the team, are issues that need to be discussed in depth. Teams need to be thoughtful before choosing to sign a big contract, while maintaining a sound financial position and planning for the future. Do you think the player's contract amount is reasonable?
What factors should teams consider when signing a big contract?Welcome to leave a message to discuss.