Voting is about to take place in the Taiwan legislature, and the People's Party has announced their election plan. According to the plan, the People's Party will vote for Huang Shanshan in the first round, and will not participate in the voting in the second round, and the blue, green and white candidates will compete. This plan is essentially an attitude of abstention, which has an impact on both the People's Party and the Kuomintang. According to the current situation, ** has 51 votes, the KMT has 52 votes, and two votes are non-party. Among them, Kim Sumei, who is not a party member, will vote for the Kuomintang, so the Kuomintang has at least 53 votes, which means that Han Kuo-yu and Jiang Qichen can be declared elected. However, in the past 25 years, Taiwan's legislature only learned the results at the last minute. The move of the People's Party to vote in the first round and withdraw in the second round could mean that they already know the news and may come out in the second round. In Taiwan, more than half of the members must be present to be elected as the person in charge. So if only a relative majority is needed in the second round to be elected, then only one vote to win is enough. The People's Party may have known in advance, so they chose to withdraw in the second round.
If the KMT wins the second round of voting, they will not win just one vote, they should win at least three. Why did the People's Party avoid the second round of voting? Probably because they already knew that there was a vote within the KMT that would run the vote. If the final result becomes 53 to 52, then if the two votes suddenly run away, or if there is a Kuomintang person**, 53 to 52 is formed. For the Kuomintang who ran the votes, the political cost was very low, and they only needed to become non-partisan, but they could get huge benefits. Invalid Vote Choice: The People's Party's Misses and Opportunities In the past few days, the heat of Taiwan's election can be described as unprecedentedly high. As a beginner in politics, I followed the discussion and couldn't help but be confused about the People's Party's choice to scrap the vote. After all, the People's Party was supposed to be taken off the shelves, but now it has given up this opportunity. This brings me to the question: will the vote-repeal option damage the image of the People's Party? On the one hand, the People's Party's choice to repeal votes may cause discontent among the people.
After all, they had hoped to overthrow the rule of *** by abolishing the votes, but now they seem to have given up on this opportunity. In doing so, the PPP may offend some voters who want to reform and make them feel that the PPP is just a group of politicians who pay lip service to the truth. On the other hand, however, the abolition option may also present an opportunity for the People's Party. If the KMT wins the election, the People's Party's choice to scrap the vote may be able to displease the KMT. After all, the KMT thought it could work with the People's Party, but now it has been hit by the abolition of votes. In this way, the People's Party may be able to use this opportunity to negotiate with the Kuomintang and gain more resources and support. However, we must not ignore the fact that the abolition option is not good for the People's Party. Because they don't seem to really want to reform the parliament, but they want *** to help them get some positions. In this way, the People's Party may be labeled a "political opportunist", causing them to lose some voter support. Taiwanese politics are very complex, and some small changes can change the whole situation.
And the People's Party's choice to scrap votes is like a stone thrown into the water, which will cause a ripple effect. It could make the People's Party a sinner, criticized for "political speculation" and lose voter support. But at the same time, it could also give the People's Party an opportunity to negotiate with the KMT to gain more resources and support. So, is the choice of invalid ticket right or wrong? I don't think there is an absolute answer to this question. After all, everyone understands and expects politics differently. For some, the abolition option is a form of dissatisfaction with the existing political system. For others, the vote-rejecting option is a waste, a waiver of political opportunity. In any case, we should be rational about the option of invalidating votes. After all, everyone has the right to express their opinions and wishes. Only through full discussion and debate can we find the most suitable development path for Taiwan. References: 1 "Invalid tickets"Concept Analysis: Why Are Young People Willing to Scrap Tickets?
*: Xinhua News Agency) 2.Taiwan's Election: The Significance and Impact of the Invalid Vote Choice (*BBC Chinese Network)3The People's Party's Vote Cancellation Choice: Right or Wrong or Opportunity? (Taiwan Political Review Network).