"The Lobster" is a thought-provoking American film, which reveals that social norms play a coercive role in the film, restricting the individual's freedom and independent thinking ability by coldly portraying the constraints of social norms on the individual's free choice and independent thinking.
The protagonists in the film must choose their partners according to the established rules and time frames, otherwise they will be punished by becoming animals, which undoubtedly poses a great threat to the right of individuals to choose freely, and provokes a deep reflection on the power and norms in the social framework.
A single-person restraint hotel has set a tight deadline for singles to find a suitable partner within 45 days. This system imposes strict rules on the free choice and time limits of individuals, forcing them to find a life partner as quickly as possible. 
The film depicts a harsh world for singles, who are ostracized and discriminated against, who often feel anxiety and stress because they know that time is ticking and that if they can't find a partner, they seem to lose their identity.
This anxiety and stress forces them to have to make decisions in a limited amount of time, sometimes not because of genuine affection and attraction, but to escape the unforeseen future.
This system has a profound impact on the free choice and independent thinking of single people, who have to find a partner within a specific framework, and the constraints of time and social pressure have constrained them, so that they cannot decide on the choice of a partner according to their own needs and feelings.
This institutional constraint deprives them of their autonomy and the exercise of their individual will, forcing them to conform to the standards set by society rather than their true selves.
The single people in the film are bound by a series of absurd social norms according to which they must choose a partner, such as myopia, unstable gait, and other characteristics, while the true feelings and attractiveness of the individual are put on the back burner.
This emphasizes the impact of social norms on the free choice of individuals.
While individuals pursue free choice, they are often constrained by normative standards and have to make decisions according to these standards. In addition, singles are under great pressure and prejudice in society, they have no partner, are seen as outliers, and are ostracized and devalued in cultural products such as movies.
They are forced to adapt to societal norms of mate choice, which is undoubtedly a social constraint.
Movie characters often give up their self-thinking and autonomy in order to create an image, and individuals often sacrifice their true emotions and desires in the process of seeking a partner, just to meet the expectations of society.
This restriction causes individuals to lose the ability to think for themselves, becoming obedient to social norms rather than their true selves. By revealing the constraints of social norms on the free choice of individuals, the film shows the lack of individual freedom and independence in a regulated society.
The film deeply reveals the restrictions of society on individual behavior and choice, and triggers the audience's challenge and reflection on the freedom and autonomy of individuals due to this standardization.
In the process of pursuing a partner, people are deeply influenced by social norms. This canonical standard makes people seek to be socially recognized and accepted, so they choose partners who conform to social norms as a way to gain a sense of social identity and integration.
Such a choice of mate can bring about a sense of acceptance and worth, making people feel like they belong in society.
In movies, people who don't have a partner face social ostracism and contempt. To cope with this pressure, individuals tend to follow normative criteria to find a partner.
They fear being seen as abnormal or socially unacceptable, so the motivation to follow norms is to avoid social pressure and deprivation of identity. The need for human survival and self-protection makes individuals choose to follow standardized standards to find a partner when faced with existential threats, so as to ensure the possibility of their own survival.
They understand that time is of the essence and that if they cannot find a partner, they will lose their identity as human beings, and this inherent pressure drives them to make decisions within the stipulated time and follow the rules to meet time limits and regulations.
In the process of finding a partner, people's motivation to follow the rules is mainly derived from social proof, avoiding exclusion, survival needs, and internal anxiety and stress, which motivate them to conform to the rules and abandon their personal independent thinking and autonomy in order to meet the standards and expectations set by society.
With its grim approach, the film reveals the absurd standards of society for partner choice. In the film, traits such as myopia and unstable gait are seen by society as necessary conditions for partner selection, while true affection and attraction are overlooked.
This absurd standard ruthlessly exposes the absurdity and irrationality of social norms in mate choice.
Within the stipulated 45 days, the single person must find a partner or face the fate of being turned into an animal. Such time constraints put people under a huge sense of pressure and urgency.
In such a situation, people tend to lose the ability to think independently and begin to conform to society's norms of partner choice. They begin to stop being guided by their true feelings and desires, but to compromise in order to fit into social norms.
This loss of the individual's ability to think independently shows the severe limitations that social norms place on the individual's freedom and autonomy.
The Lobster reveals the harshness and ruthlessness of social norms and the suppression of individual free choice and independent thinking with cold brushstrokes. With the help of exaggerated and absurd plots, the film highlights the strict constraints of social norms on individuals, and guides the audience to contemplate the freedom and autonomy of individuals in a standardized society.
The hotel's managers and employees seem to be deciding the fate of the singles through their strict control and surveillance. This unequal power relationship seems to put individuals at risk of manipulation and deprivation of autonomy in the search for a partner.
This raises questions about the fairness of the distribution of power in society, whether individuals are forced to follow the rules and standards set by the hotel, and give up their autonomy and the exercise of their own will.
The film "The Lobster" challenges society's norms of individual behavior and choice in a unique way, triggering people's thinking about the restrictions on individual freedom and individual choice in a standardized society.
Through absurd partner selection criteria, the film questions traditional notions of love, making people reflect on the biases and one-sided standards in the notion of love, as well as the limitations on true feelings and autonomous choices.
At the same time, the film also questions the power and norms in the social framework, and stimulates the audience to think about inequality and limitations in society.
The audience's in-depth exploration of the individual's free choice and independent thinking reveals the phenomenon that individuals are bound by social norms and time pressure in the process of seeking a partner, which triggers the audience's deep reflection on whether individuals can freely pursue their true feelings and desires.
The film's vivid depiction of the restriction of free choice has aroused the audience's attention and thinking about the right of individual free choice.
Characters often abandon independent thinking in partner choices and tend to follow norms. The film provokes us to think: can we truly understand our own needs and individual identities when we are unable to think independently and challenge social norms?
At the same time, the film reveals the brutal limitations of social norms on individuals, raising viewers to question whether these norms are in line with the real needs and values of individuals. The film emphasizes the importance of independent thinking and autonomy.
The film provokes the audience to think deeply about whether individuals are bound by the norms of the social framework when choosing a partner, and whether they can truly express themselves and stick to their own will.
Through the independent choice and independent thinking of the individual, the film triggers the audience's deep thinking about the impact of the social framework on the individual's freedom and autonomy, and challenges the audience's perception of the individual's position and authenticity in society.
Viewers are encouraged to think deeply and challenge the normative society, how society influences individual behavior and choices, and whether these effects are fair and reasonable.
This reflection prompts the audience to become more aware of the constraints of the social framework on individual freedom and autonomy, and provokes a deep reflection on the distribution of power and norms in society.
Challenge the absurd rules of partner selection, inspire the audience to discover the power of individual independent thinking and values, and inspire them to deeply explore and reflect on traditional standards and concepts.
The audience begins to think about how to insist on self-choice and independent thinking in a unified social system, and pursue the true needs and values of the heart, which prompts people to re-examine their status and distribution of power in society, and stimulates the yearning for freedom and autonomy.
The film inspires viewers to question the impact of social rules and norms on individual freedom and autonomy, and encourages them to think deeply and challenge traditional standards and values.
This reflection and challenge encourages the audience to actively pursue individual freedom and autonomy in real life, and pushes society towards a more open, inclusive, and free direction.