The teaching ability of teachers in training institutions is certainly not as good as that of school teachers in general, but this gap in ability is not obvious in primary and junior high schools, but it is very obvious in high schools.
The advantage of junior high school training institutions is that it is different from the teaching system of the school, rather than the teacher itself, that is, the teaching of the learning model like industrial production, so that students can achieve the effect of rapid score improvement.
The reason why there will be a significant improvement in grades compared to in-class teaching, and a more relaxed learning experience for children is because they avoid the most important and difficult part, which is the thinking process, with problem-solving skills.
Breaking the pattern of example problems and teaching from the improvement of thinking is to guide students to understand and master the thinking process, a geometric proof and be able to touch the analogy, which has higher requirements for teaching ability, and the same is true for learning ability.
Many students will be obviously uncomfortable in this teaching method of guiding the thinking mode, and still stay in passive learning without too much active thinking, and the teaching method of the training institution meets this learning needs, that is, let them continue to stay in the comfort zone of thinking, bypass the way of thinking to solve problems, that is, directly memorize the model and apply the model, and form a conditioned reflex through a large number of training.
This teaching model is simpler, but the teacher will certainly not adopt it, which is not in line with the essence of education, which is to promote thinking rather than simply putting scores first.
However, this model has made many students and children more recognized, allowing them to achieve different ways to overtake students with stronger thinking skills.
But this is based on the simplicity of the knowledge system in junior high school, and the teaching mode of high school has no meaning, and the training class does not go beyond the means of improving the performance of teachers in the class, and the children who are admitted to high school, especially the key high school children, are much wiser than the students who brush the model in person, knowing that what you teach is not real knowledge but routines.
The only ones who can bring improvement to high school students are high school teachers, and although high school students have fewer make-up classes, high school teachers have more make-up classes, of course, this kind of make-up classes will not be made public, but one-on-one at home.