Text: Liu Lanchang.
Now that the final verdict on the KMT's 15.6 billion yuan of party property belonging to CIC and its affiliated companies has been handed down, the KMT is still required to provide evidence according to the most important reason, except for party fees, political contributions, and election subsidies, these three items are a legitimate party property, and everything else is improper party property. So 15.6 billion confiscated, ** authorities may also require these 15.6 billion assets to be confiscated on February 1, in this case,First, can 15.6 billion still be saved? In the future, the Kuomintang will still have a lot of production, how will the defense war continue?
This issue is discussed at two levelsThe first is whether or not the KMT's party property is legal, or even whether the KMT's acquisition of the party property is legal or not, and even whether the KMT's acquisition of the party property is legal or not. Second, legally, is there sufficient reason for the KMT to maintain his party property or to continue to own it? From the study of the Kuomintang's party history, most of these party properties are legitimate, because when it comes to property, the Kuomintang has a clear conscience, because the Kuomintang has been from the Xinhai Revolution to the Northern Expedition for so long, where did he get the ** funding, it was all the money he raised, and for a long time later, the party affairs were not dividedSo one of the reasons is that the party treasury is connected to Taiwan's treasury, is there such a situation?
Yes, especially during the period when the two Chiangs were in power, but after careful analysis, what is the work of the party? What is the content of party work? Party affairs included the "Maritime Trade Union," which was very large in scale and spent a lot of money, and what he did was to comfort overseas Chinese and gather intelligenceIs this kind of work a party affair for the Kuomintang? No, for example, the Zhongshan Scholarship has provided a huge amount of scholarships and cultivated many talents, including Xu Xinliang, who relied on the Zhongshan Scholarship to study abroad to obtain a degree and then return to Taiwan. To give another small example, there are now public service stations everywhere in Taiwan, what are public service stations? It was a pure Kuomintang organization, and there was a people's service society in each district, and its safe kept some cash for local charity work and emergency relief work, and the target of the "maritime trade union" was not limited to Kuomintang members.
In addition, in the long process of the Kuomintang ruling later, a lot of the land allocated at the beginning was legalized, and the land ownership was purchased from the Taiwan Property Bureau through the party department. There was also a cleanup during the Ma Ying-jeou era, what cleanup? Looking back at the time when you bought the land, did you use the privileges of the Kuomintang, this price is unreasonable, as long as the Taichung City Party Department bought a piece of land, the Taichung City Party Department was the first public land, and later bought it from the Taiwan Property Bureau, after the purchase, Ma Ying-jeou did an inventory, what was the land price when he bought it, for example, at that time, ** was 100,000 yuan per square meter, 80,000 yuan per square meter or 120,000 square meters to pass the customs, if the difference is not big, if the original **, 100,000 yuan you bought it for 20,000 yuanThis land, which was considered illegal in the Ma Ying-jeou era, has been automatically returned to the "** So today's KMT's party property is almost clear conscience, and there is no problem, because the origin of party property is very complicated, there are overseas donations, and there are profits from the operation of party enterprises.
What ifIt is a rule of law, theoretically you want to say that my party property is illegal, and it should be proved by ***, ** to prove that it is not legal, not by yourself to prove that it is legal or illegal, which violates the most basic legal principlesPointing to the Kuomintang, of course, it is *** to adduce evidence, but if you can't cite evidence, the Kuomintang is legitimate, at the beginning of the Kuomintang, because at that time when the party property regulations were passed, the Kuomintang had no combat effectiveness, and the "Blue Sky Action Alliance" went to the party industry meeting on the streets, and resisted very fiercely, the Kuomintang ignored it, as if it had nothing to do with him, and ignored this matter, which was 100% untenable in legal theory, and also encouraged the Kuomintang to fight on the basis of reasonDon't take the initiative to give back to "** why?"
The result of the initiative is to give the impression of spitting out stolen goodsThe Kuomintang should argue on the basis of reason, after the court ruling, what is mine is mine, not mine, I will give it back"** or *** illegal, this ** is illegal**, the court is opened by his family, he ruled that this party property, no matter what reason I say, he must confiscate it, that is a banditry, and it also leaves a historical record of banditry, and it confirms the banditry.
And there is now a Transitional Justice Promotion Ordinance, and one of the branches below it is called the Committee on the Misconduct of Party PropertyThis committee is ridiculous, he has both judicial power and executive power, executive power and investigation power, all powers, and he is a ** unit under the legislative branch through the executive branch, he actually has so much power, he said that the illegal party property is illegal, he said that legal is legitimate, this is ridiculous,It is up to the court to decide whether it is lawful or not"Improper Party Property Handling Committee" is tantamount to encroaching on judicial powerAnd the name is ridiculousThe "Improper Party Property Handling Committee" means that all Kuomintang party assets are improperIsn't that ridiculous? Who are you? What kind of unit are you, the Kuomintang should decide whether the party property is improper or not, and the legislature has passed a body called the "Improper Party Property Handling Committee" to deduct the hat first, and all party property is improper.
Therefore, as far as the law is concerned, dealing with the issue of the Kuomintang's party property is tantamount to illegal play, but there is no way at present, and it is very difficult to abolish itMoreover, like many leaders of the Kuomintang, including Hou Youyi, they have no understanding of the ins and outs of the party's propertyThey also do not understand the legality of the regulations on improper party property, and they are very inferior to think that party property is equal to one of the evils of the Kuomintang, so they advocate that party property should be returned to zero, because it is unreasonable for a political party to spend too much money in a democratic society, but one of my principles, before my party property is zeroed, you have to return my innocence, and you say that this money is dirty from me and illegally obtained by me. Therefore, Hou Youyi and these people are not clear about the ins and outs of the party property, and they are not clear about the decree, so the problem of the party property is unsolvable during the first time in power, because the law has been passed and the organization already existsUnless the legislature has a majority, the situation cannot be reversedThen the court is opened by the first family, and their family is opened, and the chance of winning the lawsuit is not great, so the issue of party property is a very pessimistic topic.
If Han Kuo-yu can take the lead of the legislature, and the Kuomintang and the People's Party have the majority of the legislature, can they also investigate the so-called assets of the party, we know that *** also spent a lot in the election, and I don't know where it came from, will this also be put on file for review? This should be okay,But will Ke P cooperate with the Kuomintang very sincerely? This is worrying, because Ke P has no political ideals and no central idea, and his team is a representative of the people's will of many Taiwan's legislatures with evil intentionsSo in the future, whether you can cooperate loyally, if you are loyal and cooperative, you can have an in-depth understanding of the party's property, which is okay.
100 Quick Reviews
Copyright Notice:This article is the author's original article,**Information** on the Internet, the text content of this article is strictly prohibited from being illegal without authorization**, if you need**or quote must be agreed by the author and indicated**.