Recently, Germany has become the focus of attention, and dramatic events have continued one after another. First, a group of peasants forced their way into Berlin with an excavator and expressed their gratitude to the plan to abolish agricultural subsidies. Immediately afterwards, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz also led a group of people to demonstrate in the streets against the AfD's plan to deport refugees.
At the same time, Germany's Steinmeier also took active action and personally went to Vietnam to find new support. The situation quickly became confusing, and the future of Germany became difficult. At the same time, China's response during this period clearly shows a grand pattern.
Why is Germany in such a chaotic situation? The main reason for this is that serious problems have arisen in economic development. In the face of financial constraints, ** and the people are in trouble, and all kinds of contradictions naturally burst out. The fundamental reason for Germany's predicament lies in the mysterious operation of the first class, and it is difficult for a clever woman to cook without rice.
All this seems to have been foreshadowed as early as the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict is essentially the result of NATO's continuous eastward expansion, and Germany is clearly one of the culprits behind it. If Germany had been able to stand up and raise objections within NATO at that time, leaving some room for Russia to develop, perhaps the war would not have broken out. Even after the outbreak of war, Germany still had the opportunity to make its own choice. Because the Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been built into Germany, if sanctions against Russia are lifted, Russian energy will continue to be sold to Germany, so that German companies can continue to grow.
In fact, Germany has followed the United States, and its frequent sanctions have made Russia see the true face of the United States and Western countries. Russia has directly banned energy exports to NATO countries, resulting in German companies having to buy energy only from the United States and other places. However, the ** in these places is much higher than in Russia, which makes Germany have been "sacrificing itself for others", making all the money made by the American ** fire dealers, and the development of German enterprises has become difficult.
Due to the slow development of enterprises, the financial revenue of ** will naturally decrease. Faced with financial difficulties, Scholz** has drawn up plans to eliminate agriculture-related subsidies. However, such a move directly harmed the interests of the German peasants, which they could not accept. Some radical peasants even drove tractors into the capital, Berlin, to demand that Scholz change his plans.
Scholz didn't say anything about it, or he didn't have time to do so, because he was busy dealing with it. In addition to the farmer, another piece of news that worries Scholz is that the AfD's support has reached 19%. If this trend continues, the future of Germany could be dominated by the AfD, which is difficult for Scholz to accept.
This is because many of the AfD's governing philosophies are incompatible with the current German mainstream, such as leaving the European Union and deporting refugees. If they come to power, Germany could once again be the target of public criticism. Therefore, Scholz did not bother to reply to the letter to the peasant friends, and went straight to the streets in person, leading a part of the people to choose the party's "deportation of refugees" plan.
According to statistics, more than a quarter of Germany's population has a refugee background, so the AfD's plan is opposed by many Germans. Thus, a peculiar phenomenon occurred: the German peasants took to the streets **Scholz**, and Scholz himself went to the streets **AfD**. There was a lot of support from the masses on both sides, and the streets of Germany were really lively for a while.
At a time when German society is facing turmoil, the German ** Steinmeier is also going to take action. For the sake of Germany's development and future, he decided to do his part. But why did Steinmeier go to Vietnam for help?
It turned out that he believed that the root cause of the turmoil in Germany was the stagnation of economic development. In order to solve this problem, it is one of the keys to introduce a sufficient number of labor and technical personnel to make up for the dilemma caused by the shortage of labor. Vietnam is undoubtedly an ideal partner in the labor market.
One might ask, why not go straight to China or India? After all, the two countries have much more labor than Vietnam.
The reason why Germany chose not to cooperate with China is that it is more inclined to follow the United States in its overall China strategy. Frequent sanctions against China have brought considerable obstacles to Sino-German cooperation, and this dilemma is mainly caused by themselves.
India is not considered because Germany mainly lacks skilled personnel, while India, despite its large population, has a relatively backward overall level of technology. Recruiting Indian talent entails a lot of training costs, which is clearly not worth the cost in the eyes of German companies.
In contrast, Vietnam has attracted a number of labor-intensive enterprises that have migrated from the Chinese market in recent years, which has significantly improved the technical level of the domestic labor force. Germany could make direct use of these workers, so Steinmeier decided to go to Vietnam. In Vietnam, he has repeatedly publicly expressed the friendly and cooperative relations between Germany and Vietnam, and promised that Vietnamese skilled workers working in Germany will enjoy fair treatment and certain subsidies, which is very attractive to the Vietnamese labor force.
At the same time, some German companies also have the opportunity to invest and set up factories in Vietnam, which not only promotes the development of German enterprises, but also promotes the progress of Vietnam's local economy. This is a good thing for win-win cooperation, and Vietnam is certainly willing to participate.
However, some netizens expressed concern that German-Vietnamese cooperation may affect the friendly relations between China and Vietnam, which in turn will affect the development of Chinese enterprises in Vietnam. In this regard, I don't think there is any need to worry, the development of enterprises needs healthy competition. As long as Germany does not violate our bottom line, what they do is their business, and we don't need to pay too much attention to it.
Therefore, our country did not oppose Germany's move to recruit talents in Vietnam. We believe that Vietnam** has the ability to grasp the overall situation, and win-win cooperation has always been our goal, which is exactly the attitude that China has always adhered to.
It is worth mentioning that at the end of last year, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz personally visited Africa in search of energy. It is really touching that Germany, as an old power, is now in the dilemma of "begging" everywhere.
It turns out that following the United States, you don't eat nine meals in three days. It is hoped that Germany will be able to see the reality in front of it, be independent, and truly formulate some policies that benefit the people from the perspective of its own development and the interests of the people.
What are your thoughts on this?