A week after the capsizing of the vessel, the ** side was resolute and refused to apologize for the incident. But in the past few days, they have found that this matter is definitely not so easy to solve. Zhang Yanting, a retired deputy commander of the Air Force, suddenly found that the squadron was a little "wrong", as if it was "cutting sausage tactics" with the Taiwan army.
On 22 February, Zhang Yanting issued a statement on a television station: Judging from the current tough stance of the squadron, the Taiwan patrol will not continue to detain our fishing boats after the Kinmen incident. Due to the gradual loss of four lines in Taiwan:
the first line, known as the "middle line of the strait";
The second area, known as the "Restricted Waters", is known as the "Exclusion Zone".
The third, called the "Temporary Connection Zone", was seized;
The fourth is to recover all the "seaside" land.
Zhang Yanting felt that the first and second of these four routes were gone, and if the mainland army continued to follow his plan, then the third and fourth routes would also be destroyed by him. With this realization, the authorities have loosened themselves on many issues.
At a news conference held at noon on 22 February, Taiwan's "Coast Guard" proposed for the first time that pensions be paid to fishermen in the mainland. Xie Ching-chin, chief inspector of Taiwan's "Coast Guard," said that the specific amount of compensation will not be determined until the matter is clear.
It's all this time, and you still want to settle it with silver? This is simply because *** authorities are too naïve.
Why did Xie Qingqin bite the word "find out the truth" so hard? Because the Taiwan officials and the two surviving fishermen had two different views on February 14:
1.Although Taiwan has admitted that it had been in contact with a mainland fishing vessel, it has always refused to accept the fact of a deliberate collision; But according to the two surviving fishermen, it was not like it was unintentional when the man found their boat and rushed towards their boat.
2.The relevant departments of Taiwan stressed that they first carried out the rescue operation, but the two surviving fishermen said that after the boat capsized, they got off the boat themselves.
At present, some newspapers in Taiwan say that the living fisherman changed his story after returning to China. After the accident, the two fishing boats were arrested by Taiwan's "Coast Guard" and subsequently investigated by the "Coast Guard." At present, Taiwan's media said that they did not specifically point out that they did not specifically state that they were deliberately collided when answering reporters' questions.
At this point, he still wants to slander our fisherman, which is really ill-intentioned. If they didn't want to crash the car, why didn't the Taiwan side hand over the video footage of that day?
As long as you have a little knowledge of law, you will understand that the so-called "intentional or unintentional" is the key to judging the nature of a case. Taiwan's ** insisted that it was deliberately harmed, believing that the CCP could not help them. However, they obviously underestimated the resolute attitude of the Chinese communists in completely handling the Taiwan issue, and Taiwan's fishing boats were not asking for "condolence money" but facts and explanations. The Chinese tradition is that human life is more important than anything else.
In short, now that the capsizing of the ship continues, the authorities will definitely come up with more things. Our **, on the one hand, wants to support the fisherman and vows to ask the Taiwan side to explain; As for the actions of the Chinese communists in the Taiwan Strait, they must follow their own pace, whether they are really "slicing sausages" as others say, whatever they think.