Not only are we eating this big melon in the United States, but even some bigwigs can't help but turn on the "mockery" mode ......
I believe that everyone has been attracted by entries such as "American civil strife", "Texas independence", "Texas tough Biden" in the past two days, and they are also happy to be an international melon eater.
Although most of the comrades-in-arms have a general understanding of the ins and outs of the matter, in order to take care of the friends who eat this melon for the first time, the author will briefly introduce this matter.
The incident began when Biden applied to the Supreme Court for approval to dismantle Texas' self-built border barbed wire, and then Biden ordered the federally owned Border Patrol to enforce the order.
Now you can provoke the "Texas cowboys", your federal** own border control policy is a mess, so that a large number of illegal immigrants from Central and South America have come to our Texas, and now we have to tear down the barbed wire fence that we built at our own expense?
Grandmother! We're not used to your stinky temper!
As soon as he said so, the governor of Texas, who held the command of the state national guard reserve, immediately mobilized his troops to the border, and an armed confrontation with federal border law enforcement officers ensued, and suddenly the whole United States was filled with the smell of gunpowder.
Didn't you Biden hold the "sword of the Supreme Court"? OK, the governor of Texas also moved out of the "iron roll of death", stating that the federal constitution gives Texas the right to self-defense and the right to defend against "invasion".
This matter is getting bigger and bigger, and Texas Lieutenant Governor Patrick choked Biden and said: Don't mess with Texas. Immediately after that, it was announced that Texas would continue to build blade barbed nets on the border.
It is unclear whether this matter will not be resolved or whether it will continue to escalate. But this wave of big melons has feasted the eyes of the international melon-eating masses, including us.
Many Russian politicians have even turned on the "group satire" mode ...... this
On the 29th local time, Russian spokeswoman Zakharova sarcastically suggested that the United States should establish an international coalition to liberate Texas. And ridiculed on social platforms: The United States should inherit Obama's fine tradition and declare that "Texas must go".
* In August 2011, Obama said of Syria Bashar al-Assad that Assad must go as part of a political settlement of the Syrian conflict, according to the analysis.
Former Russian Prime Minister and former **Medvedev even posted on social media**: The United States is on the verge of a constitutional crisis and civil war, and the possibility of establishing an independent "Texas People's Republic" looks increasingly likely.
I believe that Biden sees these taunts from his opponents, and his blood pressure must be soaring in a straight line!
After chatting about the light-hearted content, it's time to get some dry stuff next! Will Texas become independent after all?
There are various analyses on the Internet, such as "Texas independence must meet these three conditions", "other states agree", "referendum", ......Wait a minute.
The author will not adopt the statement that it is impossible to verify its legal basis or historical records, nor will it be released for everyone to see.
Through a large number of data inquiries, the author did dig up some real materials, which can prove that Texas can indeed be independent in legal theory.
In 1869, Texas sued Wright, the underwriter, for the illegal Texas bonds held by the Confederate Confederate Congress, and the Supreme Court issued a final decision on the case. It was publicly written in the verdict that the union of the American states was permanent and irrevocable. But at the same time, I also wrote this paragraph:
there was no place for reconsideration or revocation, except through revolution or through consent of the states.
What this means is that the revolution or other states agree to it!
The precedents of the U.S. Supreme Court have important reference significance for similar judicial trials in the future, so the author can say with certainty that there are only two fundamental ways for Texas to become independent: one is to obtain the consent of other states; The second is a violent revolution, and then a war of independence.
That's interesting! It is impossible to expect other states to agree to Texas independence, and the reason could not be simpler, and this precedent cannot be set! Otherwise, in the future, if any state is not satisfied with the federal **, it will engage in independence, and the United States will soon be finished.
But it is not so simple to set off a violent revolution! First of all, there must be public support, at least a 600,000-strong signature, and then a state referendum, which can only prove the legitimacy of the revolution by going through this process.
But do Texans really want to be independent? This is a big question mark!
After all, Texas is the largest base and main position of the Republican Party, and it should only be Biden and the Democratic Party that they are not used to.
To sum up, Texas can be independent de jure, but it is basically impossible to achieve it through peaceful means except to launch a revolution, but it is very difficult to set off a revolution.
This is a great test of Biden's political wisdom! To remain tough is to intensify the contradictions and push the country into the abyss of civil war, but if it retreats, it will mark a major collapse of the federal authority and a great victory for the Republican Party over the Democratic Party.
The dilemma is a true portrayal of Biden's current situation, but judging from the author's superficial understanding of Biden, he will most likely choose a decent way to make concessions, after all, he is not a strong leader.
At the end of the article, the author shared an interview in which when the Fox News host asked Texas Lieutenant Governor Patrick whether this would turn into a "civil war", he replied:
We believe that constitutionally we are right. We have the right to defend our citizens. We have the right to defend this country. We're just doing our job.
Did the politically astute comrades-in-arms smell the crisis from the Texas Lieutenant Governor's answer? If you understand this passage, please write your opinions in the comment area so that more comrades-in-arms can see ......