When we should be linked to the size of our responsibility, we must first realize that ability and responsibility are interrelated. A person's abilities not only determine how much responsibility they are able to take, but it also affects how they fulfill their responsibilities. Therefore, there is some justification for linking the magnitude of responsibility to capacity.
Some people believe that only human responsibility is considered true responsibility. That is, a person's responsibilities should be commensurate with their abilities. This not only ensures the quality of the completion of the task, but also avoids unnecessary stress and frustration. In this context, those with higher capabilities should take on more responsibilities because they have the skills and resources to carry them out.
However, there are also those who hold a different view. They believe that while competence is one factor in determining the size of responsibility, it is not the only factor. Sometimes, we can't just assign responsibilities based on a person's abilities, but also need to consider factors such as their wishes, motivations, values, etc. For example, a person who is very capable but lacks a sense of responsibility may not be suitable to take on great responsibilities. Conversely, a person with limited abilities but full of enthusiasm and dedication may be better suited to take on certain responsibilities.
To sum up, although competence is an important factor in influencing the size of responsibility, we cannot decide how much responsibility a person should take on based on ability alone. When assigning responsibilities, we need to consider a combination of factors to ensure that the task can be completed properly. Therefore, there is some truth in linking the size of responsibility to capacity, but it is also important to pay attention to the influence of other factors. February** Dynamic Incentive Program