Xue Zhiqian stealing photos? As usual, why bother picking bones in eggs
Xue Zhiqian posted a comment on the movie "Flying Life 2" on Weibo, and distributed a few pictures of the filmed movie. Unexpectedly, it was such a small move that sparked heated discussions.
Because of Xue Zhiqian's behavior, he was labeled as a thief, which made the whole network quarrel, which attracted various controversies and discussions.
I believe that many people have a type of behavior, that is, when you are in a movie, you can take a few movie pictures casually, and then add a set of text, and then send them to the circle of friends or other social platforms, so as to show the sense of the scene. In addition to taking a few live photos during the movie, there are also audience members who take a few photos and show off when watching a concert.
This kind of behavior has long been commonplace on social platforms, and everyone is accustomed to it. But Xue Zhiqian's ordinary behavior has attracted all kinds of doubts, and the reason is that Xue Zhiqian is a well-known public figure, and his every move, word and deed will be highly concerned by the public.
Therefore, what Xue Zhiqian did was just the ordinary things of the general public, just ask, haven't we usually done such a move?
Speaking of piracy, it reminds me of the previous VCD prevalence stage, not long after the release of a blockbuster, some video stores on the street will sell the gun disc version of the same movie.
In addition to the blurred picture, it is also mixed with the laughter and talking of the audience in the theater, so it can be said that this behavior is indeed a theft of photography, because this behavior has only one purpose, that is, to make a profit, and there is no one.
At that time, this kind of behavior was very common, the buyer had a demand, and the seller met the buyer's demand, and this kind of behavior was undoubtedly illegal profit-making, and it was 100% theft.
But Xue Zhiqian's behavior is just to share clips of his daily life on social platforms, not to mention that he only took a few movie screens, and did not shoot the whole movie and upload it to others**, from this point of view, how can it be called stealing? !
To put it bluntly, in this era of traffic supremacy, there are always good people who don't think it's a big deal to amplify, magnify and amplify a small thing, and go online, giving each other all kinds of stigma, so as to get a steady stream of traffic.
When this happened, soon, many ** and experts stood up to interpret the matter, speaking seriously, saying it with nose and eyes, and the reaction speed was unimaginable.
I'm surprised, if it were something else this time, would these people jump out of all kinds of explanations so quickly? Probably not, because there have been some public events before, and these people have either pretended to be deaf and dumb, or ignored them, or pretended that nothing had happened, and in short, turned a blind eye.
On the contrary, for Xue Zhiqian, which is so ordinary that it can no longer be ordinary, it has attracted the attention of so many people, it can only be said that these people are quite tactful, and they choose objects and events in a targeted manner, relatively speaking, expressing their stance on Xue Zhiqian's matter will not bring them any damage, so they can't wait to talk about Xue Zhiqian.
Taking a few pictures of a movie in the cinema is not much different from shooting and sharing them casually. Besides, Xue Zhiqian's behavior did not bring any commercial damage to the movie, so how can he talk about stealing filming? !
So, some people don't want to be so glassy, or they are delusional, and when they see a little thing, they are overly nervous, as if everything around them is wrong, and only they are right.
Just like Xue Zhiqian's incident, it is normal, but it is not appropriate to make him feel like he has done so many evils, and he should not do things that are picky in the eggs. Otherwise, it will not be good to feel that you are surrounded by bad people and bad things all day long.