Zhang Yimou's name is like a dazzling banner in the film industry, and his works show the changes of history, the contest of human nature, and the diversity of society.
However, his latest work, Article 20, has sparked unexpected controversy, and it seems that not everyone can accept the film without scruples.
The movie "Article 20" is famous in the film industry for its profound character portrayal and rich emotional tension in the style of Zhang Yimou. Just when the audience was full of praise for this film, it was suddenly sharply criticized by a lawyer.
It's like a heavy blow, and it's a cause for concern. The fully qualified criminal law lawyer went so far as to point out that the most despicable aspect of Article 20 is that it deliberately smears lawyers in order to highlight the noble image of prosecutors.
His remarks on the Internet were like a shock bomb, stirring up waves. He angrily claimed: In fact, not a single unjust case was discovered and corrected by the procuratorate's conscience, and all these unjust cases were promoted through the lawyer's campaign, appeal, and voice.
These words are like a sharp sword, directly poking at the flaws of the judicial system shown in the film. "It's hard to agree that the film portrays prosecutors as omnipotent heroes and lawyers as mercenary characters," he criticized. ”
There is no truth in his remarks, and we must admit it. In reality, the struggle, appeal, and voice of lawyers are the key to promoting the retrial of unjust cases.
However, the audience expressed doubts and reflections on the lack of sufficient respect for the treatment and presentation of this character in the film "Article 20". The lawyer's bashing sparked a wave of discussion on the issue online.
Some people criticize lawyers as the spokesperson of the financier, believing that they only pursue profits; Prosecutors, on the other hand, are seen as heroes in the struggle for social justice.
Some have questioned the integrity of lawyers on the basis of their own experiences, and some have even claimed to have paid legal fees, only to end up having to sue lawyers.
In this debate, the profession of lawyer seems to be the focus of much questioning. However, just as there are two sides to the coin, the profession of lawyer has its positive side.
In life, there are many lawyers who make unremitting efforts for the fairness and justice of society with their professional knowledge and firm belief in justice, and they are an indispensable and important part of society.
The movie "Article 20" does not simply praise prosecutors, nor does it blindly belittle lawyers. The characterization is more like a gloomy picture, showing the complexity and imperfections of the justice system.
In the film, the lawyer does not just work for money, but provides defense for his clients in court, and is conscientious; And prosecutors are not without flaws, and some of them, although in high positions, have fallen into the quagmire of power and lost their original purpose.
There are similarities between the real world and the movie world, but there are significant differences. We should not simply measure reality by the plot of the movie, let alone generalize the complex issues in reality.
An indispensable part of the justice system are lawyers and prosecutors, each with their own responsibilities and checks and balances to ensure justice and fairness in society.
We should examine the film with a rational attitude, not only to observe the superficial phenomena, but to dig deep into the ideas and meanings contained in them.
The film "Article 20" presents not just a simple black and white opposition, but a gray picture, showing the intricacies of the judicial system and the diversity of human nature.
Article 20" was unexpected in this year's Spring Festival, but it was not unexpected. In a unique way, behind the hustle and bustle of the theater, it tells a profound story of law and justice.
While this film may not be the first time it has caused a sensation, it shows unparalleled perseverance and engagement. In 5 days, the box office has exceeded 800 million, which not only represents the box office results of the movie, but also the audience's resonance with justice and humanity.
In a society governed by the rule of law, everyone longs for justice to be served, and Article 20 touches on this deepest expectation in people's hearts.
Through the experience of Hao Xiuping's family played by Zhao Liying, the audience witnessed the ubiquitous legal disputes and righteous battles in life.
When the couple is in trouble for their daughter's hearing impairment, the law does not become their refuge, but becomes a chasm that is difficult to cross.
Although the film is based on the theme of law, it depicts much more than that. Through delicate brushstrokes, it shows the struggle and resistance of ordinary people in real life, and shows the fierce contest between justice and **.
Every detail is meticulously polished, and each plot is filled with intriguing tension. More importantly, this film stimulates the audience's attention to legal knowledge, which is not only an entertainment, but also an enlightenment of legal education.
Through the plot of the film, the audience has a deeper understanding of the importance of legitimate defense and the blurring of legal boundaries, and each character in the film represents the expectations and voices of ordinary people.
Whether they are forced to take the path of justice or struggle to survive in desperate situations, their ordinary stories touch people's hearts, showing the interweaving and conflict between law and human nature.
In this era full of challenges and opportunities, each of us needs to be like Hao Xiuping and bravely meet the difficulties and challenges in life.
Everyone has the right to defend their legitimate interests and defend the justice of their hearts, and as the film emphasizes, the law should not yield to lawlessness.
This movie has won the affirmation and love of the audience because of its unique charm, and has become one of the most anticipated masterpieces in this Spring Festival file.
Therefore, it can be proved through the box office results of the film and the audience's word-of-mouth feedback that "Article 20" is a rare masterpiece.
This film not only makes the audience feel the power of the law, but also triggers their deep thinking about justice and humanity. I hope that this film can continue to shine and contribute to the progress and development of society.
While we enjoy the movie, we should also think deeply about reality and realize the important role of lawyers and prosecutors. They are the guardians of justice and social justice, and their work is very important, but it is extremely difficult.
The controversy caused by the film "Article 20" is not only an examination of the film itself, but also a deep reflection on the judicial system and social issues. In this debate, we have not only witnessed the convergence of various perspectives, but also perceived people's pursuit of justice and fairness.
Perhaps it is through such debates that we can have a deeper understanding of the nature of society, comprehend the multifaceted nature of human nature, further improve the judicial system, and promote the construction of a more just and harmonious society. Zhao Liying